Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Qwen3.5 4BNemotron 3 UltraGemma 4 31B
Focus

Hard reasoning: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 179 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.5, GPT-6 Luna, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 70 models are not plotted: Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M.

70 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Qwen3.5 4B
    Quality
    35.5
    Rank
    #103/182
    Price
    $0.06/M tok
    Speed
    23tok/s
    In$0.03▾Out$0.15▾/M tok

    vs Gemma 4 31B: −24.1 quality · 0.29× price

  • Nemotron 3 Ultra
    Quality
    58.9
    Rank
    #48/182
    Price
    $1.07/M tok
    Speed
    215tok/s
    In$0.60Out$2.50/M tok

    vs Gemma 4 31B: −0.7 quality · 5.2× price

  • Gemma 4 31B
    Quality
    59.6
    Rank
    #47/182
    Price
    $0.21/M tok
    Speed
    35tok/s
    In$0.14Out$0.40/M tok

    vs Nemotron 3 Ultra: +0.7 quality · 0.19× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
NVIDIA
Google DeepMind
Released
Mar 2, 2026
Jun 4, 2026
Apr 2, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$0.03Best
$0.60
$0.14
Output price
$/M tok
$0.15Best
$2.50
$0.40
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.06Best
$1.075
$0.205
Output speed
tok/s
23
215Best
35
⚡ SambaNova 200
Context
tokens
262KBest
262KBest
256K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Not ranked
37.1±5.4
#51/103Mixed
39.6±6.5Best
#44/103Mixed
32.1±9.5
#87/146Verifiedbest value
60.7±3.3
#46/146Verified
63.5±3.6Best
#39/146Mixed
37.5±8.2
#55/82Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
57.5±8.2Best
#34/82Verified
35.5±5.8
#103/182Verifiedbest value
58.9±3.7
#48/182Verified
59.6±4.5Best
#47/182Mixed
30.8±7.8
#87/173Verifiedbest value
31.3±3.4Best
#86/173Mixed
30.4±4.2
#88/173Verified

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

—
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMLU
day 0
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
~#28/43~12.2%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Chartography
third-party
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#15/23~18.5%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks