Skip to content
Model Pareto

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Alibaba QwenProprietaryx.com ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$2.00/M tok
Output
$6.00/M tok
Blended
$3.00/M tok · 3:1
Speed
39tok/s
Context
1Mtokens

API-only; built on the Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B checkpoint with vision and 1M context.

Rankings

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#2 of 14 (estimated)~86.2%
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated86.2%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)Estimated
~#6 of 19 (estimated)~66.8%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  4. ~#6Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated66.8%
  5. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBenchEstimated
~#2 of 20 (estimated)~92.0%
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated92.0%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~#2 of 5 (estimated)~91.3%
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated91.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Verified
#9 of 531467 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #8GPT-5.51474
  4. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1467
  5. #10GLM-5.31466
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
LMArena Text (Elo)Verified
#9 of 531481 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #8GPT-5.51482
  4. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1481
  5. #10GLM-5.31480
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#9 of 26 (estimated)~1958 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #8Grok 4.72007
  4. ~#9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated1958
  5. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~#4 of 8 (estimated)~90.7%
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  4. ~#4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated90.7%
  5. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#2 of 25 (estimated)~96.8%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated96.8%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

τ²-bench (Telecom)Estimated
~#2 of 116 (estimated)~98.3%
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#3 of 12 (estimated)~83.5%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated83.5%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~57.5%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated57.5%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#5 of 18 (estimated)~90.2%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #4Claude Opus 590.8%
  4. ~#5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated90.2%
  5. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks