Skip to content
Model Pareto

GLM-4.6V

Z.ai (Zhipu)Open weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.30/M tok
Output
$0.90/M tok
Blended
$0.45/M tok · 3:1
Speed
68tok/s
Context
128Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning). Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
2× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~7,235 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.12–0.97 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~72 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (106B params, 12B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 133 GB
  • 2× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~7,235 output tok/s aggregate at batch 260 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~77,923 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5GLM-4.6VEstimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Few votesVerified
#41 of 531361 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1386
  4. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
  5. #42Trinity Large Thinking1353
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
LMArena Text (Elo)Few votesVerified
#41 of 531378 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1399
  4. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
  5. #42Trinity Large Thinking1369
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#24 of 26 (estimated)~1340 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #23Gemma 4 31B1368
  4. ~#24GLM-4.6VEstimated1340
  5. #24gpt-oss-120b961
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2GLM-4.6VEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv ReasoningEstimated
~last of 9 (estimated)below measured range (<74.5%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.5%
  4. ~#9GLM-4.6VEstimated<74.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~last of 8 (estimated)below measured range (<75.8%)
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #7Muse Glimmer75.8%
  4. ~#8GLM-4.6VEstimated<75.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)Estimated
~#41 of 43 (estimated)~0.1%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #40Ministral 3 8B0.8%
  4. ~#41GLM-4.6VEstimated0.1%
  5. #41Ministral 3 3B0.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~last of 23 (estimated)below measured range (<9.0%)
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #22Mistral Large 39.0%
  4. ~#23GLM-4.6VEstimated<9.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~42.0%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14GLM-4.6VEstimated42.0%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#70 of 75 (estimated)~7.1
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #69Devstral Small 27.5
  4. ~#70GLM-4.6VEstimated7.1
  5. #70Celeris-16.3
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~63.7%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11GLM-4.6VEstimated63.7%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3GLM-4.6VEstimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#17 of 18 (estimated)~36.1%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #16Nemotron 3 Ultra44.4%
  4. ~#17GLM-4.6VEstimated36.1%
  5. #17Mistral Small 421.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#55 of 87 (estimated)~707 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #54Claude Haiku 4.5719
  4. ~#55GLM-4.6VEstimated707
  5. #55MiniCPM5-2B694
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AAEstimated
~#72 of 80 (estimated)~0.4%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
  3. #71Ministral 3 8B0.5%
  4. ~#72GLM-4.6VEstimated0.4%
  5. #72Celeris-10.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~#79 of 89 (estimated)~5.4%
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #78Qwen3 Coder Next5.4%
  4. ~#79GLM-4.6VEstimated5.4%
  5. #79K2 Horizon 0.9B4.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks