Skip to content
Model Pareto

Ling-2.6-1T

inclusionAI (Ant Group)Open weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.30/M tok
Output
$2.50/M tok
Blended
$0.85/M tok · 3:1
Speed
~87tok/sest.
Context
262Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Ling-2.6-1T. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
16× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~21,013 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.38–3.13 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Too large
needs data-center GPUs
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (1000B params, 50B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 1250 GB
  • 16× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~21,013 output tok/s aggregate at batch 889 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~127,171 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~#4 of 5 (estimated)~82.9%
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #3Claude Haiku 4.583.0%
  4. ~#4Ling-2.6-1TEstimated82.9%
  5. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#41 of 54 (estimated)~1374 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1386
  4. ~#41Ling-2.6-1TEstimated1374
  5. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#41 of 54 (estimated)~1392 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1399
  4. ~#41Ling-2.6-1TEstimated1392
  5. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#19 of 26 (estimated)~1569 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #18Inkling1611
  4. ~#19Ling-2.6-1TEstimated1569
  5. #19Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1559
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~69.5%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14Ling-2.6-1TEstimated69.5%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#50 of 75 (estimated)~16.3
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #49Ring-2.6-1T16.6
  4. ~#50Ling-2.6-1TEstimated16.3
  5. #50K2 Horizon 3.7B15.6
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~68.5%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Ling-2.6-1TEstimated68.5%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Ling-2.6-1TEstimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~68.4%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Ling-2.6-1TEstimated68.4%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#42 of 87 (estimated)~933 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #41GPT-5.4 nano937
  4. ~#42Ling-2.6-1TEstimated933
  5. #42Qwen3.6 35B A3B879
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AAEstimated
~#42 of 80 (estimated)~11.0%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
  3. #41K2 Horizon 3.7B14.7%
  4. ~#42Ling-2.6-1TEstimated11.0%
  5. #42Qwen3.5 397B A17B6.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~#51 of 89 (estimated)~13.7%
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #50Nemotron 3 Ultra14.2%
  4. ~#51Ling-2.6-1TEstimated13.7%
  5. #51Grok Build 0.1 061613.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks