Skip to content
Model Pareto

Ling-3.0-flash-VL

inclusionAI (Ant Group)Open weightshuggingface.co ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.075/M tok
Output
$0.22/M tok
Blended
$0.111/M tok · 3:1
Speed
147tok/s
Context
262Ktokens

Open weights (MIT); 124B total / 5.5B active vision-language MoE.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
2× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~9,381 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.083–0.68 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~160 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (124B params, 5.5B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 155 GB
  • 2× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~9,381 output tok/s aggregate at batch 337 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~170,014 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 14 (estimated)~74.5%
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. #9Xing4.0-29B-A4B75.0%
  4. ~#10Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated74.5%
  5. #10Claude Haiku 4.573.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1Estimated
~#27 of 31 (estimated)~51.0%
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #2Grok 4.772.6%
  3. #26Nex-N2.5-Pro55.8%
  4. ~#27Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated51.0%
  5. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBenchEstimated
~#8 of 20 (estimated)~70.9%
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
  3. #7gpt-oss-20b77.7%
  4. ~#8Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated70.9%
  5. #8Mistral Small 464.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Coding Agent IndexEstimated
~last of 15 (estimated)below measured range (<41.1)
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  4. ~#15Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated<41.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv ReasoningEstimated
~#7 of 9 (estimated)~77.1%
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #6Inkling78.1%
  4. ~#7Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated77.1%
  5. #7Claude Sonnet 577.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~#5 of 8 (estimated)~83.2%
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
  4. ~#5Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated83.2%
  5. #5Claude Haiku 4.579.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~#19 of 23 (estimated)~14.1%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #18Grok 4.714.7%
  4. ~#19Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated14.1%
  5. #19DeepSeek V4.1 Flash11.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#4 of 25 (estimated)~93.5%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #3Nova 2.0 Lite94.3%
  4. ~#4Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated93.5%
  5. #4gpt-oss-120b93.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

τ²-bench (Telecom)Estimated
~#37 of 116 (estimated)~74.1%
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
  3. #36GPT-5.4 nano76.0%
  4. ~#37Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated74.1%
  5. #37Nova 2.0 Lite72.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~70.7%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated70.7%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~71.5%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Ling-3.0-flash-VLEstimated71.5%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks