Skip to content
Model Pareto

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AIOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.25/M tok
Output
$0.80/M tok
Blended
$0.388/M tok · 3:1
Speed
337tok/s
Context
512Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Trinity Large Thinking. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
8× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~29,038 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.12–0.99 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Ultra 512GB (int4, ~130 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (398B params, 13B active per token) + 40% KV-cache headroom ≈ 557 GB
  • 8× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~29,038 output tok/s aggregate at batch 1044 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~287,716 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

DeepSWE v1.1Estimated
~#28 of 31 (estimated)~48.0%
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #2Grok 4.772.6%
  3. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
  4. ~#28Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated48.0%
  5. #28Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Coding Agent IndexEstimated
~last of 15 (estimated)below measured range (<41.1)
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  4. ~#15Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated<41.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Verified
#42 of 531353 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
  4. #42Trinity Large Thinking1353
  5. #43gpt-oss-120b1338
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
LMArena Text (Elo)Verified
#42 of 531369 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
  4. #42Trinity Large Thinking1369
  5. #43INTELLECT-31356
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#24 of 26 (estimated)~1331 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #23Gemma 4 31B1368
  4. ~#24Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated1331
  5. #24gpt-oss-120b961
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~71.0%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated71.0%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~60.8%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated60.8%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~56.0%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Trinity Large ThinkingEstimated56.0%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks