Skip to content
Model Pareto

Qwen3.5 4B

Alibaba QwenOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.03/M tok
Output
$0.15/M tok
Blended
$0.06/M tok · 3:1
Speed
23tok/s
Context
262Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning). Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
BF16 weights
Throughput
~15,768 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.048–0.43 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
RTX 5090 32GB (int4, 300+ tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • BF16 weights (4B params) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 10 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~15,768 output tok/s aggregate at batch 256 (bandwidth-bound)
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~132,891 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Qwen3.5 4BEstimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#42 of 54 (estimated)~1360 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
  4. ~#42Qwen3.5 4BEstimated1360
  5. #42Trinity Large Thinking1353
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#41 of 54 (estimated)~1379 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1399
  4. ~#41Qwen3.5 4BEstimated1379
  5. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#21 of 26 (estimated)~1492 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1540
  4. ~#21Qwen3.5 4BEstimated1492
  5. #21Gemini 3.1 Pro1491
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.5 4BEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv ReasoningEstimated
~last of 9 (estimated)below measured range (<74.5%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.5%
  4. ~#9Qwen3.5 4BEstimated<74.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~#6 of 8 (estimated)~78.5%
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #5Claude Haiku 4.579.6%
  4. ~#6Qwen3.5 4BEstimated78.5%
  5. #6Mistral Small 476.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)Estimated
~#33 of 43 (estimated)~5.7%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #32Qwen3.6 35B A3B6.6%
  4. ~#33Qwen3.5 4BEstimated5.7%
  5. #33Claude Haiku 4.53.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~last of 23 (estimated)below measured range (<9.0%)
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #22Mistral Large 39.0%
  4. ~#23Qwen3.5 4BEstimated<9.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~64.3%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14Qwen3.5 4BEstimated64.3%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#52 of 75 (estimated)~14.5
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #50Qwen3.5 122B A10B15.6
  4. ~#52Qwen3.5 4BEstimated14.5
  5. #52Mistral Medium 3.514.2
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~58.9%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11Qwen3.5 4BEstimated58.9%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Qwen3.5 4BEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~53.4%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Qwen3.5 4BEstimated53.4%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#55 of 87 (estimated)~703 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #54Claude Haiku 4.5719
  4. ~#55Qwen3.5 4BEstimated703
  5. #55MiniCPM5-2B694
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks