Ling 3.0 Flash
- Input
- $0.075/M tok
- Output
- $0.22/M tok
- Blended
- $0.111/M tok · 3:1
- Speed
- 346tok/s
- Context
- 262Ktokens
Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Ling 3.0 Flash. Price = AA median host price.
Rankings
Coding
Verified#63 / 103rank by quality34.3±8.0quality / 1002/7 benchmarks measuredSpeed frontierHard reasoning
Verified#49 / 182rank by quality58.7±5.8quality / 1002/4 benchmarks measuredPrice frontierSpeed frontierAgents
Verified#34 / 173rank by quality49.8±10.0quality / 1001/7 benchmarks measuredPrice frontierSpeed frontier
Self-hostingEstimated
How we estimate →What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.
- Hardware
- 2× H200 141GB
- FP8 weights
- Throughput
- ~9,742 tok/s
- many requests batched
- Price
- $0.079–0.65 /M tok
- busy → light use
- On your own machine
- Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~170 tok/s single-stream)
- single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
- FP8 weights (124B params, 5.1B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 155 GB
- 2× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
- ~9,742 output tok/s aggregate at batch 350 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
- Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~183,349 tok/s
- Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price
Benchmark scores
~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.
Coding
SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 14 (estimated)~73.9%
- #1Claude Opus 596.0%
- #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
- #9Xing4.0-29B-A4B75.0%
- ~#10Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated73.9%
- #10Claude Haiku 4.573.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)Estimated
~#17 of 19 (estimated)~53.0%
- #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
- #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
- #15Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54.2%
- ~#17Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated53.0%
- #17Muse Glimmer51.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1Estimated
~#28 of 31 (estimated)~49.5%
- #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
- #2Grok 4.772.6%
- #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
- ~#28Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated49.5%
- #28Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 4.0Verified
#49 of 830.0%
- #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
- #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
- #49K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B0.0%
- #49Ling 3.0 Flash0.0%
- #49Ling 3.0 Tiny0.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBenchEstimated
~#8 of 20 (estimated)~70.6%
- #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
- #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
- #7gpt-oss-20b77.7%
- ~#8Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated70.6%
- #8Mistral Small 464.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
SciCodeVerified
#54 of 9542.0%
- #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
- #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
- #54K-EXAONE 2.0 080342.0%
- #54Ling 3.0 Flash42.0%
- #56Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite41.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent IndexEstimated
~last of 15 (estimated)below measured range (<41.1)
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
Hard reasoning
GPQA DiamondVerified
#44 of 17285.5%
- #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
- #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
- #44KAT Coder Pro V285.5%
- #44Ling 3.0 Flash85.5%
- #46MiMo-V2.584.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Humanity's Last ExamVerified
#51 of 17823.7%
- #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
- #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
- #50Qwen3.5 122B A10B25.2%
- #51Ling 3.0 Flash23.7%
- #52Gemma 4 31B23.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)Estimated
~#2 of 25 (estimated)~94.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#38 of 75 (estimated)~24.4
- #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
- #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
- #37Ling-3.0-flash-VL24.6
- ~#38Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated24.4
- #38GPT-5.4 mini24.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
Agents
τ²-bench (Telecom)Estimated
~#37 of 116 (estimated)~75.5%
- #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
- #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
- #36GPT-5.4 nano76.0%
- ~#37Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated75.5%
- #37Nova 2.0 Lite72.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#9 of 12 (estimated)~71.5%
- #1Kimi K384.8%
- #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
- #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.0%
- ~#9Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated71.5%
- #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~72.6%
- #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
- #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
- #14Inkling77.1%
- ~#15Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated72.6%
- #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#23 of 87 (estimated)~1386 Elo
- #1Claude Opus 5.51846
- #2Claude Fable 5.11735
- #22Qwen3.8 27B1409
- ~#23Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated1386
- #23GPT-6 Luna1367
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AAEstimated
~#29 of 80 (estimated)~26.8%
- #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
- #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
- #28Apodex 1.128.2%
- ~#29Ling 3.0 FlashEstimated26.8%
- #29GPT-5.4 mini26.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks