Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
K2-Horizon-32BHy3Quasar 438B
Focus

Hard reasoning: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 181 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.5, GPT-6 Luna, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 71 models are not plotted: Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2-Horizon-32B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, North Mini Code, K2-V2, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, LFM2 24B A2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M.

71 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2-Horizon-32B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, North Mini Code, K2-V2, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, LFM2 24B A2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • K2-Horizon-32B
    Quality
    56.1
    Rank
    #53/184
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Hy3: −8.0 quality · price n/a

  • Hy3
    Quality
    64.1
    Rank
    #42/184
    Price
    $0.25/M tok
    Speed
    86tok/s
    In$0.14▾Out$0.58▾/M tok

    vs K2-Horizon-32B: +8.0 quality · price n/a

  • Quasar 438B
    Quality
    50.2
    Rank
    #70/184
    Price
    $0.90/M tok
    Speed
    152tok/s
    In$0.60Out$1.80/M tok

    vs Hy3: −13.9 quality · 3.6× price

Overview

Lab
MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models
Tencent Hunyuan
Multiverse Computing
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Jul 6, 2026
Aug 10, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
—
$0.14Best
$0.60
Output price
$/M tok
—
$0.58Best
$1.80
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$0.25Best
$0.90
Output speed
tok/s
—
86
152Best
Context
tokens
524K
256K
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

21.1±10.1
#93/105Lab-reported
34.3±4.3
#63/105Mixed
39.0±8.0Best
#48/105Verified
Not ranked
67.7±6.0
#32/147Verified
Not ranked
56.1±6.6
#53/184Lab-reported
64.1±3.7Best
#42/184Verified
50.2±3.7
#70/184Verified
44.9±10.1
#50/175Lab-reported
45.1±4.6Best
#49/175Mixed
44.0±5.8
#51/175Verified

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Benchmarks in other categories (3)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/19below measured range (<43.8%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#14/19~54.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#10/12~69.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#10/12~70.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#10/12~70.2%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks