Skip to content
Model Pareto

HyperNova 60B 2605

Multiverse ComputingOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
—
Output
—
Speed
~110tok/sest.
Context
131Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: HyperNova 60B 2605 (high, based on gpt-oss-120b). Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs. No API sells this model, so this is its price on the chart.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~9,539 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.066–0.59 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~180 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (60B params, 4.8B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 75 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~9,539 output tok/s aggregate at batch 256 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~221,484 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~84.2%
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. ~#3HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated84.2%
  4. #3Claude Haiku 4.583.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#41 of 54 (estimated)~1380 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1386
  4. ~#41HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated1380
  5. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#41 of 54 (estimated)~1398 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #40Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1399
  4. ~#41HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated1398
  5. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~74.7%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated74.7%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#47 of 75 (estimated)~17.8
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #46Qwen3.6 35B A3B18.2
  4. ~#47HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated17.8
  5. #47Muse Glimmer17.5
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~62.1%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated62.1%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~52.5%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15HyperNova 60B 2605Estimated52.5%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks