Skip to content
Model Pareto

Solar Pro 4

UpstageProprietaryartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.30/M tok
Output
$1.20/M tok
Blended
$0.525/M tok · 3:1
Speed
93tok/s
Context
512Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Solar Pro 4. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#9 of 14 (estimated)~75.4%
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. #8Muse Glimmer76.0%
  4. ~#9Solar Pro 4Estimated75.4%
  5. #9Xing4.0-29B-A4B75.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)Estimated
~#14 of 19 (estimated)~54.6%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #13Hy357.9%
  4. ~#14Solar Pro 4Estimated54.6%
  5. #14Inkling54.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1Estimated
~#27 of 31 (estimated)~51.5%
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #2Grok 4.772.6%
  3. #26Nex-N2.5-Pro55.8%
  4. ~#27Solar Pro 4Estimated51.5%
  5. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBenchEstimated
~#8 of 20 (estimated)~75.1%
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
  3. #7gpt-oss-20b77.7%
  4. ~#8Solar Pro 4Estimated75.1%
  5. #8Mistral Small 464.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Coding Agent IndexEstimated
~last of 15 (estimated)below measured range (<41.1)
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  4. ~#15Solar Pro 4Estimated<41.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#2 of 25 (estimated)~94.7%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Solar Pro 4Estimated94.7%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#29 of 75 (estimated)~27.9
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #28MiniMax-M329.2
  4. ~#29Solar Pro 4Estimated27.9
  5. #29Quasar 438B26.7
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

τ²-bench (Telecom)Estimated
~#28 of 116 (estimated)~81.5%
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
  3. #26Qwen3.5 2B81.6%
  4. ~#28Solar Pro 4Estimated81.5%
  5. #28MiniCPM5-1B81.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~70.5%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Solar Pro 4Estimated70.5%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Solar Pro 4Estimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~69.9%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Solar Pro 4Estimated69.9%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#23 of 87 (estimated)~1374 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #22Qwen3.8 27B1409
  4. ~#23Solar Pro 4Estimated1374
  5. #23GPT-6 Luna1367
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks