Skip to content
Model Pareto

Quasar 438B

Multiverse ComputingProprietaryartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.60/M tok
Output
$1.80/M tok
Blended
$0.90/M tok · 3:1
Speed
152tok/s
Context
1Mtokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2). Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#9 of 14 (estimated)~76.0%
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. #8Muse Glimmer76.0%
  4. ~#9Quasar 438BEstimated76.0%
  5. #9Xing4.0-29B-A4B75.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)Estimated
~#14 of 19 (estimated)~55.0%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #13Hy357.9%
  4. ~#14Quasar 438BEstimated55.0%
  5. #14Inkling54.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1Estimated
~#27 of 31 (estimated)~53.6%
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #2Grok 4.772.6%
  3. #26Nex-N2.5-Pro55.8%
  4. ~#27Quasar 438BEstimated53.6%
  5. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBenchEstimated
~#8 of 20 (estimated)~72.9%
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
  3. #7gpt-oss-20b77.7%
  4. ~#8Quasar 438BEstimated72.9%
  5. #8Mistral Small 464.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Coding Agent IndexEstimated
~last of 15 (estimated)below measured range (<41.1)
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  4. ~#15Quasar 438BEstimated<41.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#12 of 25 (estimated)~80.5%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #11Claude Haiku 4.583.7%
  4. ~#12Quasar 438BEstimated80.5%
  5. #12Magistral Small 1.280.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

τ²-bench (Telecom)Estimated
~#40 of 116 (estimated)~67.6%
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
  3. #39Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B67.8%
  4. ~#40Quasar 438BEstimated67.6%
  5. #40gpt-oss-120b65.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~70.2%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Quasar 438BEstimated70.2%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Quasar 438BEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~70.3%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Quasar 438BEstimated70.3%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks