Skip to content
Model Pareto

Inkling Small

Thinking Machines LabOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Input
$0.30/M tok
Output
$1.20/M tok
Blended
$0.525/M tok · 3:1
Speed
206tok/s
Context
1Mtokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Inkling Small. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
4× B200 180GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~22,891 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.12–1.03 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Ultra 512GB (int4, ~140 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (276B params, 12B active per token) + 40% KV-cache headroom ≈ 386 GB
  • 4× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~22,891 output tok/s aggregate at batch 655 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~354,375 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Inkling SmallEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
~#6 of 9 (estimated)~78.5%
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #5Muse Glimmer78.8%
  4. ~#6Inkling SmallEstimated78.5%
  5. #6Inkling78.1%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
~#5 of 8 (estimated)~85.1%
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
  4. ~#5Inkling SmallEstimated85.1%
  5. #5Claude Haiku 4.579.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)Estimated
~#22 of 43 (estimated)~13.5%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #21Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite13.6%
  4. ~#22Inkling SmallEstimated13.5%
  5. #22GPT-5.4 mini13.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~#14 of 23 (estimated)~21.3%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #13Gemini 3.1 Pro26.1%
  4. ~#14Inkling SmallEstimated21.3%
  5. #14Grok 4.620.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

Agents

~#16 of 116 (estimated)~89.1%
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
  3. #15KAT Coder Pro V289.5%
  4. ~#16Inkling SmallEstimated89.1%
  5. #16MiniMax-M388.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~69.7%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Inkling SmallEstimated69.7%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5Inkling SmallEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~67.3%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15Inkling SmallEstimated67.3%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
~#24 of 87 (estimated)~1367 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #23GPT-6 Luna1367
  4. ~#24Inkling SmallEstimated1367
  5. #24K2 Horizon 375B A23B1349
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks