Skip to content
Model Pareto

EXAONE 4.5 33B

LG AI Research (EXAONE)Open weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
—
Output
—
Speed
~84tok/sest.
Context
262Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: EXAONE 4.5 33B. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs. No API sells this model, so this is its price on the chart.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~4,788 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.17–1.49 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
RTX 5090 32GB (int4, ~76 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (33B params) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 41 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~4,788 output tok/s aggregate at batch 137 (bandwidth-bound)
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~32,216 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~84.5%
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. ~#3EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated84.5%
  4. #3Claude Haiku 4.583.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#39 of 54 (estimated)~1392 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #38Claude Haiku 4.51395
  4. ~#39EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated1392
  5. #39GPT-5.4 nano1387
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#39 of 54 (estimated)~1408 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #38Mistral Large 31413
  4. ~#39EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated1408
  5. #39GPT-5.4 nano1402
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv ReasoningEstimated
~#8 of 9 (estimated)~74.9%
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #7Claude Sonnet 577.0%
  4. ~#8EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated74.9%
  5. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~#5 of 8 (estimated)~81.6%
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
  4. ~#5EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated81.6%
  5. #5Claude Haiku 4.579.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)Estimated
~#30 of 43 (estimated)~9.3%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #29MiniMax-M39.8%
  4. ~#30EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated9.3%
  5. #30Ling-3.0-flash-VL8.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~#20 of 23 (estimated)~11.2%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #19DeepSeek V4.1 Flash11.6%
  4. ~#20EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated11.2%
  5. #20Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite10.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#13 of 25 (estimated)~79.0%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #12Magistral Small 1.280.3%
  4. ~#13EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated79.0%
  5. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#44 of 75 (estimated)~19.3
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #43K2 Horizon 7B20.6
  4. ~#44EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated19.3
  5. #44LongCat 2.019.1
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~69.5%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated69.5%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<47.5%)
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  4. ~#5EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated<47.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#15 of 18 (estimated)~64.6%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #14Inkling77.1%
  4. ~#15EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated64.6%
  5. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~#44 of 89 (estimated)~16.4%
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #41Qwen3.7 Plus17.5%
  4. ~#44EXAONE 4.5 33BEstimated16.4%
  5. #44A.X-K216.1%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks