Compare models
Coding: quality vs price
Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.
Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.
26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge
Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B
- Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
- Evidencestrong → weak
- Estimated from other categories
- Hover a dot for details · click a lab to highlight it
- Hy3
- Quality
- 34.4
- Rank
- #61/103
- Price
- $0.25/M tok
- Speed
- 86tok/s
In$0.14▾Out$0.58▾/M tokvs Claude Sonnet 5: −22.3 quality · 0.06× price
- Claude Sonnet 5
- Quality
- 56.6
- Rank
- #27/103
- Price
- $4.00/M tok
- Speed
- 79tok/s
In$2.00Out$10/M tokvs Hy3: +22.3 quality · 16× price
- Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B)
- Quality
- 30.2
- Rank
- #73/103
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
vs Claude Sonnet 5: −26.4 quality · price n/a
Overview
Quality by category
0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.
Coding benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Benchmarks in other categories (4)· Writing & chat, Vision, Hard reasoning, Agents
Writing & chat benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Vision benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Hard reasoning benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Agents benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.