Skip to content
Model Pareto

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)

DeepSeekOpen weightsapi-docs.deepseek.com ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$1.32/M tok
Output
$3.96/M tok
Blended
$1.98/M tok · 3:1
Speed
97tok/s
Context
1Mtokens

Open weights. Peak-hour price; off-peak is 50% off.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
24× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~29,781 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.39–3.23 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Too large
needs data-center GPUs
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (1600B params, 49B active per token) + 40% KV-cache headroom ≈ 2240 GB
  • 24× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~29,781 output tok/s aggregate at batch 1260 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~194,649 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Coding

SWE-bench VerifiedEstimated
~#3 of 14 (estimated)~81.3%
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. ~#3DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated81.3%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro80.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat

IFBenchEstimated
~#20 of 126 (estimated)~75.1%
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. #19GPT-5.3 Codex75.4%
  4. ~#20DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated75.1%
  5. #20Command A+73.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLUEstimated
~#2 of 5 (estimated)~89.7%
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated89.7%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Verified
#16 of 531448 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #15GPT-5.6 Terra1456
  4. #16DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)1448
  5. #16GPT-6 Sol1448
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
LMArena Text (Elo)Verified
#16 of 531463 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #15GPT-5.6 Terra1466
  4. #16DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)1463
  5. #17Claude Sonnet 51461
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#9 of 26 (estimated)~1907 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #8Grok 4.72007
  4. ~#9DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated1907
  5. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#2 of 25 (estimated)~96.3%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated96.3%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#7 of 12 (estimated)~80.3%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #6MiMo-V2.6-Flash80.8%
  4. ~#7DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated80.3%
  5. #7GPT-5.578.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~51.0%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated51.0%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#8 of 18 (estimated)~86.3%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #7GPT-5.6 Terra87.5%
  4. ~#8DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Estimated86.3%
  5. #8Gemini 3.1 Pro85.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks