Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Nex-N2-ProClaude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 3B
Focus

Agents: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 170 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Opus 5.5. 65 models are not plotted: Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global.

65 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Nex-N2-Pro
    Quality
    40.3
    Rank
    #61/173
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −59.3 quality · price n/a

  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    99.6
    Rank
    #1/173
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs Nex-N2-Pro: +59.3 quality · price n/a

  • Granite 4.2 3B
    Quality
    17.0
    Rank
    #140/173
    Price
    $0.05/M tok
    Speed
    220tok/s
    In$0.03▾Out$0.12▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −82.5 quality · 0.01× price

Overview

Lab
Nex AGI
Anthropic
IBM Granite
Released
Jun 2, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Aug 25, 2026
Weights
Open
Proprietary
Open
Input price
$/M tok
—
$4.00
$0.03Best
Output price
$/M tok
—
$20
$0.12Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$8.00
$0.052Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
92
220Best
Context
tokens
262K
1MBest
131K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

40.5±10.0
#41/103Verified
96.9±3.4Best
#1/103Mixedbest value
17.2±8.0
#95/103Verifiedbest value
60.7±9.5
#45/146Verified
93.0±4.3Best
#3/146Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Not ranked
94.5±4.8
#2/82Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
68.3±5.8
#34/182Verified
99.9±2.6Best
#1/182Verifiedbest value
23.4±3.7
#128/182Verified
40.3±4.2
#61/173Verified
99.6±4.1Best
#1/173Verifiedbest value
17.0±5.8
#140/173Verified

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#10/12~68.0%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (1)
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#4/25~94.2%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks