Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Maple-PreviewClaude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 3B
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 111 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 36 models are not plotted: GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

36 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Maple-Preview
    Quality
    57.4
    Rank
    #32/114
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −39.2 quality · price n/a

  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    96.6
    Rank
    #1/114
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs Maple-Preview: +39.2 quality · price n/a

  • Granite 4.2 3B
    Quality
    17.8
    Rank
    #107/114
    Price
    $0.05/M tok
    Speed
    220tok/s
    In$0.03▾Out$0.12▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −78.9 quality · 0.01× price

Overview

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Lab
DeepGrove
Anthropic
IBM Granite
Released
Aug 4, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Aug 25, 2026
Weights
Open
Proprietary
Open
Input price
$/M tok
—
$4.00
$0.03Best
Output price
$/M tok
—
$20
$0.12Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$8.00
$0.052Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
92
220Best
Context
tokens
131K
1MBest
131K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Coding
57.4±10.3
#32/114Lab-reported
96.6±3.5Best
#1/114Mixedbest value
17.8±8.0
#107/114Verifiedbest value
Writing & chat
Not ranked
93.0±4.3
#3/155Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Vision
Not ranked
94.6±4.8
#2/90Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Hard reasoning
53.7±7.5
#68/193Lab-reported
99.9±2.6Best
#1/193Verifiedbest value
23.2±3.7
#138/193Verified
Agents
Not ranked
99.6±4.1Best
#1/176Verifiedbest value
17.1±5.8
#143/176Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#5/14~80.4%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #4MiniMax-M380.5%
  3. ~#5Maple-PreviewEstimated80.4%
  4. #5Hy378.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~94.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated94.8%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#12/14~64.4%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #11Nemotron 3 Ultra70.7%
  3. ~#12Granite 4.2 3BEstimated64.4%
  4. #12Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B)64.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
~#7/19~64.5%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
  3. ~#7Maple-PreviewEstimated64.5%
  4. #7GPT-5.6 Terra63.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/1889.9%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
www-cdn.anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
~#18/19~45.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #17Muse Glimmer51.2%
  3. ~#18Granite 4.2 3BEstimated45.8%
  4. #18Nex-N2.5-Mini43.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
~#29/32~48.9%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol75.2%
  2. #28Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
  3. ~#29Maple-PreviewEstimated48.9%
  4. #29Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
#9/3168.4%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol75.2%
  2. #8GPT-6 Sol69.0%
  3. #9Claude Opus 5.568.4%
  4. #9Kimi K368.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#30/32~38.2%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol75.2%
  2. #29Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
  3. ~#30Granite 4.2 3BEstimated38.2%
  4. #30Nex-N2.5-Mini36.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
~#18/85~23.2%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #17Qwen3.8 Flash-Next25.3%
  3. ~#18Maple-PreviewEstimated23.2%
  4. #18MiMo-V2.6-Flash22.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
#2/8459.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#50/840.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #50gpt-oss-20b0.0%
  3. #50Granite 4.2 3B0.0%
  4. #50Granite 4.2 8B0.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
#11/2475.1%Lab-reported
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #10Bonsai 27B76.4%
  3. #11Maple-Preview75.1%
  4. #12Mistral Small 464.0%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-30
~#2/25~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#19/25~44.2%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #18Devstral 244.8%
  3. ~#19Granite 4.2 3BEstimated44.2%
  4. #19Llama 4 Maverick39.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
~#32/103~50.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #31DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)51.0%
  3. ~#32Maple-PreviewEstimated50.8%
  4. #32Qwen3.8 Flash-Next50.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/10266.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#92/10225.3%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #91MiniCPM5-2B26.3%
  3. #92Granite 4.2 3B25.3%
  4. #93Ling 3.0 Tiny24.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
~#9/15~52.4Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #8GLM-5.353.6
  3. ~#9Maple-PreviewEstimated52.4
  4. #9Kimi K351.9
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/1466.0Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  3. ~#15Granite 4.2 3BEstimated<41.1
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
MMMU
day 0
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
MMMU-Pro
day 0
—
#1/8487.7%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
—
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
—
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
#3/4226.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.526.2%
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol24.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
Chartography
third-party
—
#2/2266.3%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
GPQA Diamond
day 0
#91/17973.5%BestLab-reported
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #90Qwen3 Coder Next73.7%
  3. #91Maple-Preview73.5%
  4. #92Ling 3.0 Tiny73.4%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-30
~#2/180~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
#131/17955.9%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #130GLM-4.6V56.6%
  3. #131Granite 4.2 3B55.9%
  4. #132LFM2.5-2.6B55.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
~#65/182~20.6%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #64Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B20.8%
  3. ~#65Maple-PreviewEstimated20.6%
  4. #65o320.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/18161.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#120/1816.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #119LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct6.7%
  3. #120Granite 4.2 3B6.6%
  4. #121MiniCPM5-1B6.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
#11/2987.5%Lab-reported
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. #10Nova 2.0 Pro Preview89.0%
  3. #11Maple-Preview87.5%
  4. #11Ternary Bonsai 27B87.5%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-30
~#2/30~99.2%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated99.2%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#19/30~44.5%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. #18Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  3. ~#19Granite 4.2 3BEstimated44.5%
  4. #19Mistral Large 338.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
~#45/78~20.6Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #44K2 Horizon 7B20.6
  3. ~#45Maple-PreviewEstimated20.6
  4. #45Ling 3.0 Flash20.1
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/7757.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#68/779.1Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #67Qwen3 Coder Next9.2
  3. #68Granite 4.2 3B9.1
  4. #69gpt-oss-20b9.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Maple-Preview
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#2/117~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#56/117~34.4%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #55Sarvam 30B34.5%
  3. ~#56Granite 4.2 3BEstimated34.4%
  4. #56Gemma 4 12B31.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#11/12~59.2%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  3. ~#11Granite 4.2 3BEstimated59.2%
  4. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#2/5~58.7%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated58.7%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  3. ~#5Granite 4.2 3BEstimated<47.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#2/18~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#15/18~51.8%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #14Inkling77.1%
  3. ~#15Granite 4.2 3BEstimated51.8%
  4. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#1/861846BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#84/86188Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #83Ministral 3 8B200
  3. #84Granite 4.2 3B188
  4. #85K2 Think V2117
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#1/7969.5%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#72/790.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #72Celeris-10.4%
  3. #72Granite 4.2 3B0.4%
  4. #74gpt-oss-120b0.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
~#3/90~50.0%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5.5Estimated50.0%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
#77/895.6%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #75Trinity Large Thinking5.8%
  3. #77Granite 4.2 3B5.6%
  4. #77HyperNova 60B 26055.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Not comparable across labs (1)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
—
#1/381.8%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—