Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Gemma 4 E4Bgpt-oss-20bGLM-4.6V
Focus

Hard reasoning: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 179 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.5, GPT-6 Luna, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 70 models are not plotted: Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M.

70 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Gemma 4 E4B
    Quality
    21.6
    Rank
    #132/182
    Price
    $0.04/M tok
    Speed
    61tok/s
    In$0.02▾Out$0.10▾/M tok

    vs gpt-oss-20b: −17.0 quality · 0.41× price

  • gpt-oss-20b
    Quality
    38.6
    Rank
    #91/182
    Price
    $0.10/M tok
    Speed
    181tok/s
    In$0.07Out$0.18/M tok

    vs Gemma 4 E4B: +17.0 quality · 2.4× price

  • GLM-4.6V
    Quality
    21.4
    Rank
    #133/182
    Price
    $0.45/M tok
    Speed
    68tok/s
    In$0.30Out$0.90/M tok

    vs gpt-oss-20b: −17.1 quality · 4.6× price

Overview

Lab
Google DeepMind
OpenAI
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Released
Apr 3, 2026
Aug 5, 2025
Dec 8, 2025
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$0.02Best
$0.07
$0.30
Output price
$/M tok
$0.10Best
$0.18
$0.90
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.04Best
$0.098
$0.45
Output speed
tok/s
61
181Best
⚡ Groq ~1,000
68
Context
tokens
128K
131KBest
128K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Not ranked
33.6±6.4
#66/103Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
30.2±9.5
#90/146Verifiedbest value
31.4±4.2Best
#89/146Verified
29.8±5.1
#91/146Verified
25.9±8.2Best
#67/82Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
19.7±8.2
#72/82Verified
21.6±5.8
#132/182Verifiedbest value
38.6±3.4Best
#91/182Verified
21.5±5.8
#133/182Verified
21.7±10.0
#114/173Verifiedbest value
24.0±4.2Best
#108/173Verified
22.4±10.0
#111/173Verified

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMLU
day 0
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/8below measured range (<75.8%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~last/8below measured range (<75.8%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
~#41/43~0.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Chartography
third-party
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/5~53.8%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks