Skip to content
Model Pareto

Falcon-H1R-7B

TII (Falcon)Open weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
—
Output
—
Speed
~100tok/sest.
Context
256Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Falcon-H1R-7B. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs. No API sells this model, so this is its price on the chart.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
BF16 weights
Throughput
~11,082 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.074–0.66 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
RTX 5090 32GB (int4, 300+ tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • BF16 weights (7.59B params) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 19 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~11,082 output tok/s aggregate at batch 256 (bandwidth-bound)
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~70,035 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#42 of 54 (estimated)~1354 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1361
  4. ~#42Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated1354
  5. #42Trinity Large Thinking1353
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#42 of 54 (estimated)~1374 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #41GLM-4.6VFew votes1378
  4. ~#42Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated1374
  5. #42Trinity Large Thinking1369
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~61.0%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated61.0%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#54 of 75 (estimated)~12.9
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #53Command A+13.1
  4. ~#54Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated12.9
  5. #54Nemotron 3.5 Lightning12.9
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#10 of 12 (estimated)~67.7%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. ~#10Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated67.7%
  5. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#17 of 18 (estimated)~35.9%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #16Nemotron 3 Ultra44.4%
  4. ~#17Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated35.9%
  5. #17Mistral Small 421.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#51 of 87 (estimated)~750 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #50Qwen3.7 Plus756
  4. ~#51Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated750
  5. #51Mistral Medium 3.5747
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AAEstimated
~#48 of 80 (estimated)~5.2%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
  3. #47Qwen3.6 35B A3B5.2%
  4. ~#48Falcon-H1R-7BEstimated5.2%
  5. #48Inkling5.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks