Skip to content
Model Pareto

Ring-flash-2.0

inclusionAI (Ant Group)Open weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.14/M tok
Output
$0.57/M tok
Blended
$0.247/M tok · 3:1
Speed
~120tok/sest.
Context
128Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Ring-flash-2.0. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~5,348 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.11–1.01 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~140 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (100B params, 6.1B active per token) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 125 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~5,348 output tok/s aggregate at batch 153 (bandwidth-bound); MoE compute scales with active params
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~174,283 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Ring-flash-2.0Estimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Few votesVerified
#50 of 531293 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #49Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct1294
  4. #50Ring-flash-2.0Few votes1293
  5. #51NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B1286
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
LMArena Text (Elo)Verified
#49 of 531321 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #48Molmo2-8BFew votes1322
  4. #49Ring-flash-2.01321
  5. #50gpt-oss-20b1317
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-13
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#24 of 26 (estimated)~1280 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #23Gemma 4 31B1368
  4. ~#24Ring-flash-2.0Estimated1280
  5. #24gpt-oss-120b961
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#14 of 25 (estimated)~62.8%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  4. ~#14Ring-flash-2.0Estimated62.8%
  5. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#58 of 75 (estimated)~11.6
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #57Mercury 2.512.3
  4. ~#58Ring-flash-2.0Estimated11.6
  5. #58gpt-oss-120b11.6
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~65.8%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11Ring-flash-2.0Estimated65.8%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Ring-flash-2.0Estimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#17 of 18 (estimated)~36.0%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #16Nemotron 3 Ultra44.4%
  4. ~#17Ring-flash-2.0Estimated36.0%
  5. #17Mistral Small 421.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#59 of 87 (estimated)~581 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #58gpt-oss-120b596
  4. ~#59Ring-flash-2.0Estimated581
  5. #59Granite 4.2 30B564
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~#70 of 89 (estimated)~6.9%
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #68Qwen3.5 9B7.0%
  4. ~#70Ring-flash-2.0Estimated6.9%
  5. #70Ministral 3 14B6.6%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks