Compare models
Coding: quality vs price
Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.
Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.
26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge
Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B
- Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
- Evidencestrong → weak
- Estimated from other categories
- Hover a dot for details · click a lab to highlight it
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Quality
- 96.9
- Rank
- #1/103
- Price
- $8.00/M tok
- Speed
- 92tok/s
In$4.00Out$20/M tokvs Qwen3.8 Flash-Next: +34.9 quality · 35× price
- Granite 4.2 3B
- Quality
- 17.2
- Rank
- #95/103
- Price
- $0.05/M tok
- Speed
- 220tok/s
In$0.03▾Out$0.12▾/M tokvs Claude Opus 5.5: −79.6 quality · 0.01× price
- Qwen3.8 Flash-Next
- Quality
- 62.0
- Rank
- #20/103
- Price
- $0.23/M tok
- Speed
- 54tok/s
In$0.15Out$0.47/M tokvs Claude Opus 5.5: −34.9 quality · 0.03× price
Overview
Quality by category
0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.
Coding benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Not comparable across labs (1)· kept for reference, not counted in rankings
Benchmarks in other categories (4)· Writing & chat, Vision, Hard reasoning, Agents
Writing & chat benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Vision benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Hard reasoning benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Agents benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.