Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Qwen3.5 9BMistral Medium 3.5Kimi K2.7 Code
Focus

Agents: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 170 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Opus 5.5. 65 models are not plotted: Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global.

65 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Qwen3.5 9B
    Quality
    34.0
    Rank
    #78/173
    Price
    $0.15/M tok
    Speed
    60tok/s
    In$0.135▾Out$0.20▾/M tok

    vs Kimi K2.7 Code: −11.4 quality · 0.09× price

  • Mistral Medium 3.5
    Quality
    35.0
    Rank
    #76/173
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    149tok/s
    In$1.50Out$7.50/M tok

    vs Kimi K2.7 Code: −10.4 quality · 1.8× price

  • Kimi K2.7 Code
    Quality
    45.3
    Rank
    #47/173
    Price
    $1.71/M tok
    Speed
    66tok/s
    In$0.95Out$4.00/M tok

    vs Mistral Medium 3.5: +10.4 quality · 0.57× price

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
Mistral AI
Moonshot AI (Kimi)
Released
Mar 2, 2026
Apr 28, 2026
Jun 12, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$0.135Best
$1.50
$0.95
Output price
$/M tok
$0.20Best
$7.50
$4.00
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.151Best
$3.00
$1.712
Output speed
tok/s
60
149Best
66
Context
tokens
262KBest
256K
256K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Not ranked
34.1±6.6
#64/103Mixed
40.2±8.0Best
#43/103Verified
56.4±9.5
#50/146Verifiedbest value
58.3±4.2Best
#49/146Verified
56.4±9.5
#51/146Verified
50.5±8.2Best
#43/82Verified
38.4±6.3
#54/82Verified
Not ranked
48.2±5.8
#72/182Verified
43.9±3.6
#81/182Mixed
65.4±3.7Best
#37/182Verified
34.0±5.8
#78/173Verified
35.0±3.4
#76/173Mixed
45.3±4.2Best
#47/173Verified

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

—
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
Chartography
third-party
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.