Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Mistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.5 122B A10BQwen3.5 9B
Focus

Agents: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 170 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Opus 5.5. 65 models are not plotted: Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global.

65 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Motif 3, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, Nex-N2.5-Mini, Solar Open2 250B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), A.X-K2, EXAONE 4.5 33B, K2 Horizon 7B, Nex-N2-Pro, Tri-21B-Think, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, LongCat Flash Lite, MiniCPM5-1B, Qwen3.5 2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Solar Open 100B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Command A+, MiniCPM5-2B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nanbeige4.1-3B, K2-V2, Step3 VL 10B, INTELLECT-3, Falcon-H1R-7B, K2 Think V2, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Gemma 4 E2B, North Mini Code, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral Small 2, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, Jamba 1.7 Large, Granite 4.0 350M, Jamba 1.7 Mini, LFM2 24B A2B, Granite 4.0 Micro, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Gemma 3 270M, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, Olmo 3 7B Think, Molmo2-8B, Molmo 7B-D, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Tiny Aya Global

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Mistral Medium 3.5
    Quality
    35.0
    Rank
    #76/173
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    149tok/s
    In$1.50Out$7.50/M tok

    vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: −2.0 quality · 2.7× price

  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B
    Quality
    36.9
    Rank
    #72/173
    Price
    $1.10/M tok
    Speed
    129tok/s
    In$0.40Out$3.20/M tok

    vs Mistral Medium 3.5: +2.0 quality · 0.37× price

  • Qwen3.5 9B
    Quality
    34.0
    Rank
    #78/173
    Price
    $0.15/M tok
    Speed
    60tok/s
    In$0.135▾Out$0.20▾/M tok

    vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: −3.0 quality · 0.14× price

Overview

Lab
Mistral AI
Alibaba Qwen
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Apr 28, 2026
Feb 24, 2026
Mar 2, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$1.50
$0.40
$0.135Best
Output price
$/M tok
$7.50
$3.20
$0.20Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$3.00
$1.10
$0.151Best
Output speed
tok/s
149Best
129
60
Context
tokens
256K
262KBest
262KBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

34.1±6.6Best
#64/103Mixed
31.8±8.0
#70/103Verified
Not ranked
58.3±4.2
#49/146Verified
58.7±4.2Best
#48/146Verified
56.4±9.5
#50/146Verifiedbest value
38.4±6.3
#54/82Verified
46.1±6.3
#49/82Verified
50.5±8.2Best
#43/82Verified
43.9±3.6
#81/182Mixed
52.5±3.7Best
#60/182Verified
48.2±5.8
#72/182Verified
35.0±3.4
#76/173Mixed
36.9±4.2Best
#72/173Verified
34.0±5.8
#78/173Verified

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Chartography
third-party
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.