Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Llama 4 ScoutINTELLECT-3Qwen3 Coder Next
Focus

Hard reasoning: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 179 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Gemma 4 E4B, Sarvam 30B, Qwen3.5 4B, Sarvam 105B, Ling 3.0 Flash, MiMo-V2.5, GPT-6 Luna, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next, GLM-5.3 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 70 models are not plotted: Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M.

70 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, Solar Open2 250B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, G9v3-39A5B, K2 Horizon 7B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, EXAONE 4.5 33B, Nanbeige4.1-3B, HyperNova 60B 2605, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, INTELLECT-3, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker, Command A+, K2 Horizon 3.7B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Think V2, Step3 VL 10B, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B, K2-V2, North Mini Code, Falcon-H1R-7B, Solar Open 100B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, MiniCPM5-2B, LongCat Flash Lite, HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B), Tri-21B-Think, EXAONE 4.0 32B, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, LFM2.5-2.6B, Devstral 2, LFM2.5-8B-A1B, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct, Olmo 3 7B Think, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Devstral Small 2, Phi-4-mini-flash-reasoning, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.5 2B, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B, LFM2 24B A2B, Exaone 4.0 1.2B, Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision), Gemma 4 E2B, Molmo2-8B, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking, LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, MiniCPM5-1B, Jamba 1.7 Large, MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct, Granite 4.0 Micro, Jamba Reasoning 3B, Jamba 1.7 Mini, Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, Tiny Aya Global, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B, Granite 4.0 H 350M, K2 Horizon 0.9B, Qwen3.5 0.8B, Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Molmo 7B-D, Gemma 3 270M

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Llama 4 Scout
    Quality
    17.4
    Rank
    #145/182
    Price
    $0.31/M tok
    Speed
    107tok/s
    In$0.19▾Out$0.68▾/M tok

    vs INTELLECT-3: −24.2 quality · price n/a

  • INTELLECT-3
    Quality
    41.6
    Rank
    #84/182
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs Qwen3 Coder Next: +8.3 quality · price n/a

  • Qwen3 Coder Next
    Quality
    33.3
    Rank
    #112/182
    Price
    $0.56/M tok
    Speed
    126tok/s
    In$0.35Out$1.20/M tok

    vs INTELLECT-3: −8.3 quality · price n/a

Overview

Lab
Meta
Prime Intellect
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Apr 5, 2025
Nov 27, 2025
Feb 3, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$0.19Best
—
$0.35
Output price
$/M tok
$0.68Best
—
$1.20
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.313Best
—
$0.563
Output speed
tok/s
107
—
126Best
Context
tokens
10MBest
131K
256K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

14.5±6.4
#99/103Verified
Not ranked
26.6±8.0Best
#83/103Verified
27.5±9.5
#99/146Verified
27.6±4.5Best
#98/146Verified
27.0±9.5
#100/146Verified
26.2±8.2
#66/82Verified
Not ranked
Not ranked
17.4±4.3
#145/182Verified
41.6±5.8Best
#84/182Verified
33.3±3.7
#112/182Verified
12.1±5.8
#173/173Verified
25.6±10.0
#103/173Verified
26.9±4.2Best
#98/173Verified

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMLU
day 0
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<81.3%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
~last/8below measured range (<75.8%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
—
Chartography
third-party
~last/23below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks