Skip to content
Model Pareto

Command A

CohereOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$2.50/M tok
Output
$10/M tok
Blended
$4.375/M tok · 3:1
Speed
57tok/s
Context
256Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Command A. Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
2× H200 141GB
FP8 weights
Throughput
~2,291 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.53–4.35 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (int4, ~8 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • FP8 weights (111B params) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 139 GB
  • 2× H200 141GB at $3.59–$7.91/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~2,291 output tok/s aggregate at batch 82 (bandwidth-bound)
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~8,424 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Command AEstimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#46 of 54 (estimated)~1308 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #45Llama 4 Maverick1311
  4. ~#46Command AEstimated1308
  5. #46Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1Few votes1306
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#46 of 54 (estimated)~1333 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #45Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1Few votes1348
  4. ~#46Command AEstimated1333
  5. #46Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct1330
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)Estimated
~#22 of 26 (estimated)~1442 Elo
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #21Gemini 3.1 Pro1491
  4. ~#22Command AEstimated1442
  5. #22Mistral Large 31412
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#15 of 25 (estimated)~36.9%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
  4. ~#15Command AEstimated36.9%
  5. #15Devstral 236.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence IndexEstimated
~#73 of 75 (estimated)~4.8
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #72Ministral 3 8B5.5
  4. ~#73Command AEstimated4.8
  5. #73Ministral 3 3B4.8
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~62.9%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11Command AEstimated62.9%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Command AEstimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseCompEstimated
~#17 of 18 (estimated)~31.6%
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #16Nemotron 3 Ultra44.4%
  4. ~#17Command AEstimated31.6%
  5. #17Mistral Small 421.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)Estimated
~#55 of 87 (estimated)~701 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #54Claude Haiku 4.5719
  4. ~#55Command AEstimated701
  5. #55MiniCPM5-2B694
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AAEstimated
~#74 of 80 (estimated)~0.3%
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
  3. #72Granite 4.2 3B0.4%
  4. ~#74Command AEstimated0.3%
  5. #74gpt-oss-120b0.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~last of 89 (estimated)below measured range (<3.3%)
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #88Llama 4 Scout3.3%
  4. ~#89Command AEstimated<3.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks