Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Claude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 3BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    96.9
    Rank
    #1/103
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): +37.8 quality · 2.7× price

  • Granite 4.2 3B
    Quality
    17.2
    Rank
    #95/103
    Price
    $0.05/M tok
    Speed
    220tok/s
    In$0.03▾Out$0.12▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −79.6 quality · 0.01× price

  • Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
    Quality
    59.1
    Rank
    #24/103
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    39tok/s
    In$2.00Out$6.00/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −37.8 quality · 0.38× price

Overview

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Lab
Anthropic
IBM Granite
Alibaba Qwen
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Aug 25, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$4.00
$0.03Best
$2.00
Output price
$/M tok
$20
$0.12Best
$6.00
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$8.00
$0.052Best
$3.00
Output speed
tok/s
92
220Best
39
Context
tokens
1MBest
131K
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Coding
96.9±3.4Best
#1/103Mixedbest value
17.2±8.0
#95/103Verifiedbest value
59.1±4.5
#24/103Verified
Writing & chat
93.0±4.3Best
#3/146Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
82.4±6.0
#9/146Verified
Vision
94.5±4.8Best
#2/82Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
77.4±4.8
#10/82Verified
Hard reasoning
99.9±2.6Best
#1/182Verifiedbest value
23.4±3.7
#128/182Verified
82.1±3.7
#13/182Verified
Agents
99.6±4.1Best
#1/173Verifiedbest value
17.0±5.8
#140/173Verified
85.2±5.8
#7/173Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/14~94.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated94.7%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#12/14~64.5%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #11Nemotron 3 Ultra70.7%
  3. ~#12Granite 4.2 3BEstimated64.5%
  4. #12Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B)64.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~86.2%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated86.2%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
#1/1889.9%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
www-cdn.anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
~#18/19~45.9%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #17Muse Glimmer51.2%
  3. ~#18Granite 4.2 3BEstimated45.9%
  4. #18Nex-N2.5-Mini43.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#6/19~66.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  3. ~#6Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated66.8%
  4. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#8/3068.4%BestVerified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #7GPT-6 Sol69.0%
  3. #8Claude Opus 5.568.4%
  4. #8Kimi K368.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#29/31~37.4%Estimated
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #28Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
  3. ~#29Granite 4.2 3BEstimated37.4%
  4. #29Nex-N2.5-Mini36.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
#27/3051.0%Verified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #26Nex-N2.5-Pro55.8%
  3. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
  4. #28Qwen3.8 27B42.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#2/8359.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#49/830.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #49gpt-oss-20b0.0%
  3. #49Granite 4.2 3B0.0%
  4. #49Granite 4.2 8B0.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#8/8338.9%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #7GLM-5.341.9%
  3. #8Qwen3.8 Max (0902)38.9%
  4. #9GPT-5.6 Terra35.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/20~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#14/20~40.8%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #13Devstral 244.8%
  3. ~#14Granite 4.2 3BEstimated40.8%
  4. #14Llama 4 Maverick39.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~92.0%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated92.0%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#1/9566.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#86/9525.3%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #85MiniCPM5-2B26.3%
  3. #86Granite 4.2 3B25.3%
  4. #87Ling 3.0 Tiny24.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#22/9552.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #22GPT-5.4 mini52.1%
  3. #22Qwen3.8 Max (0902)52.1%
  4. #24DeepSeek V4.1 Flash51.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
#1/1466.0BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #14GPT-6 Luna41.1
  3. ~#15Granite 4.2 3BEstimated<41.1
estimated from related benchmarks
#11/1443.3Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #10Grok 4.647.0
  3. #11Qwen3.8 Max (0902)43.3
  4. #12DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)43.1
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
IFBench
day 0
~#2/126~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated82.8%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#7/126~80.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #6Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B)80.9%
  3. ~#7Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated80.8%
  4. #7Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B80.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLU
day 0
~#2/5~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/5~91.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated91.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
#1/531501BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
—
#9/531467Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #8GPT-5.51474
  3. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1467
  4. #10GLM-5.31466
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
#1/531509BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
—
#9/531481Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #8GPT-5.51482
  3. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1481
  4. #10GLM-5.31480
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
#7/252050Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #6GLM-5.32075
  3. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
  4. #8Grok 4.72007
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
—
~#9/26~1958Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #8Grok 4.72007
  3. ~#9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated1958
  4. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
estimated from related benchmarks

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
#1/7687.7%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
#6/7682.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #5GPT-6 Sol83.3%
  3. #6Qwen3.8 Max (0902)82.8%
  4. #7Gemini 3.1 Pro82.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#4/9~84.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 Flash-Next84.6%
  3. ~#4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated84.1%
  4. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#4/8~90.7%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated90.7%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
#3/4226.2%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.526.2%
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol24.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
#7/4222.8%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #6GPT-5.6 Terra24.0%
  3. #7Qwen3.8 Max (0902)22.8%
  4. #8Kimi K322.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
#2/2266.3%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
—
#8/2229.1%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #8GPT-6 Luna29.1%
  3. #8Qwen3.8 Max (0902)29.1%
  4. #10Muse Spark 1.327.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond
day 0
~#2/173~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
#124/17255.9%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #123GLM-4.6V56.6%
  3. #124Granite 4.2 3B55.9%
  4. #125LFM2.5-2.6B55.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#13/17292.8%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #13DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)92.8%
  3. #13Qwen3.8 Max (0902)92.8%
  4. #15GPT-5.6 Terra92.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#1/17861.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#117/1786.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #116LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct6.7%
  3. #117Granite 4.2 3B6.6%
  4. #118MiniCPM5-1B6.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#16/17843.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #16Grok 4.743.1%
  3. #16Qwen3.8 Max (0902)43.1%
  4. #18GPT-5.6 Terra42.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/25~96.7%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.7%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#14/25~44.1%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #13Phi-4-reasoning-plus78.0%
  3. ~#14Granite 4.2 3BEstimated44.1%
  4. #14Mistral Large 338.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.8%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated96.8%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#1/7457.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#65/749.1Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #64Qwen3 Coder Next9.2
  3. #65Granite 4.2 3B9.1
  4. #66gpt-oss-20b9.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#10/7445.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #9MiMo-V2.6-Pro46.3
  3. #10Qwen3.8 Max (0902)45.4
  4. #11GLM-5.344.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5.5
Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#55/116~34.0%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #54Sarvam 30B34.5%
  3. ~#55Granite 4.2 3BEstimated34.0%
  4. #55Gemma 4 12B31.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#11/12~59.2%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  3. ~#11Granite 4.2 3BEstimated59.2%
  4. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~83.5%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated83.5%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
~#2/5~58.7%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated58.7%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #4GPT-5.547.5%
  3. ~#5Granite 4.2 3BEstimated<47.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/5~57.5%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated57.5%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
~#2/18~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#15/18~51.8%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #14Inkling77.1%
  3. ~#15Granite 4.2 3BEstimated51.8%
  4. #15Mistral Medium 3.548.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#5/18~90.2%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #4Claude Opus 590.8%
  3. ~#5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Estimated90.2%
  4. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
#1/861846BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#84/86188Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #83Ministral 3 8B200
  3. #84Granite 4.2 3B188
  4. #85K2 Think V2117
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#7/861668Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro1673
  3. #7Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1668
  4. #8GLM-5.31646
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
#1/7969.5%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#72/790.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #72Celeris-10.4%
  3. #72Granite 4.2 3B0.4%
  4. #74gpt-oss-120b0.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#18/7956.2%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #17Claude Opus 556.6%
  3. #18Qwen3.8 Max (0902)56.2%
  4. #19Qwen3.8 Flash-Next55.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
~#3/89~50.0%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5.5Estimated50.0%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
#76/885.6%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #74Trinity Large Thinking5.8%
  3. #76Granite 4.2 3B5.6%
  4. #76HyperNova 60B 26055.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#5/8847.8%BestVerified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #4Qwen3.8 27B48.0%
  3. #5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)47.8%
  4. #6Claude Fable 5.147.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Not comparable across labs (1)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
#1/381.8%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—
—