Compare models
Coding: quality vs price
Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.
Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.
26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge
Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B
- Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
- Evidencestrong → weak
- Estimated from other categories
- Hover a dot for details · click a lab to highlight it
- Nex-N2.5-Pro
- Quality
- 61.6
- Rank
- #21/103
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
vs GPT-5.6 Terra: −8.2 quality · price n/a
- Qwen3.8 27B
- Quality
- 43.9
- Rank
- #39/103
- Price
- $1.13/M tok
- Speed
- 43tok/s
In$0.50▾Out$3.00▾/M tokvs GPT-5.6 Terra: −25.9 quality · 0.25× price
- GPT-5.6 Terra
- Quality
- 69.8
- Rank
- #12/103
- Price
- $4.50/M tok
- Speed
- 83tok/s
In$2.00Out$12/M tokvs Nex-N2.5-Pro: +8.2 quality · price n/a
Overview
Quality by category
0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.
Coding benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Not comparable across labs (1)· kept for reference, not counted in rankings
Benchmarks in other categories (4)· Writing & chat, Vision, Hard reasoning, Agents
Writing & chat benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Vision benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Not comparable across labs (1)· kept for reference, not counted in rankings
Hard reasoning benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.
Agents benchmarks
Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.