Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 3B
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 102 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 27 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

27 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT-6.1 Sol
    Quality
    85.3
    Rank
    #5/105
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$2.00Out$10/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −11.4 quality · 0.5× price

  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    96.6
    Rank
    #1/105
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs GPT-6.1 Sol: +11.4 quality · 2× price

  • Granite 4.2 3B
    Quality
    17.4
    Rank
    #97/105
    Price
    $0.05/M tok
    Speed
    220tok/s
    In$0.03▾Out$0.12▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −79.2 quality · 0.01× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
Anthropic
IBM Granite
Released
Sep 29, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Aug 25, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$2.00
$4.00
$0.03Best
Output price
$/M tok
$10
$20
$0.12Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$4.00
$8.00
$0.052Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
92
220Best
Context
tokens
922K
1MBest
131K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

85.3±6.4
#5/105Mixed
96.6±3.5Best
#1/105Mixedbest value
17.4±8.0
#97/105Verifiedbest value
92.6±10.0
#4/147Estimated from other categoriesbest value
93.0±4.3Best
#3/147Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
85.1±8.2
#5/83Verified
94.5±4.8Best
#2/83Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
91.5±5.1
#6/184Verified
99.9±2.6Best
#1/184Verifiedbest value
23.3±3.7
#129/184Verified
84.7±12.5
#9/175Estimated from other categories
99.6±4.1Best
#1/175Verifiedbest value
17.1±5.8
#142/175Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#5/15~57.3Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/15below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/9~85.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#4/8~90.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/25~96.5%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/116~97.8%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~83.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~last/5below measured range (<47.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (2)