Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 5.5Nex-N2.5-Mini
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 116 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Nex-N2.5-Mini, Nex-N2.5-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5. 34 models are not plotted: GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

34 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Haiku 5.5
    Quality
    66.2
    Rank
    #19/119
    Price
    $0.20/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$0.10Out$0.50/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −29.5 quality · 0.03× price

  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    95.7
    Rank
    #1/119
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs Claude Haiku 5.5: +29.5 quality · 40× price

  • Nex-N2.5-Mini
    Quality
    34.3
    Rank
    #67/119
    Price
    $0.04/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$0.025▾Out$0.10▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −61.5 quality · 0.01× price

Overview

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
Lab
Anthropic
Anthropic
Nex AGI
Released
Oct 7, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 8, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$0.10
$4.00
$0.025Best
Output price
$/M tok
$0.50
$20
$0.10Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.20
$8.00
$0.044Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
92
—
Context
tokens
1MBest
1MBest
262K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
Coding
66.2±8.0
#19/119Verified
95.7±3.6Best
#1/119Mixedbest value
34.3±8.6
#67/119Lab-reportedbest value
Writing & chat
Not ranked
88.3±4.3
#5/156Verified
Not ranked
Vision
78.7±9.7
#7/91Lab-reportedbest value
94.0±4.8Best
#2/91Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Hard reasoning
81.3±5.1
#17/200Verifiedbest value
99.9±2.6Best
#1/200Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Agents
Not ranked
99.6±4.1Best
#1/178Verifiedbest value
49.1±8.9
#38/178Lab-reportedbest value

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/14~86.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated86.8%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~94.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated94.7%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#11/14~72.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #10Claude Haiku 4.573.3%
  3. ~#11Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated72.3%
  4. #11Nemotron 3 Ultra70.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
~#6/20~68.1%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  3. ~#6Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated68.1%
  4. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/1989.9%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
www-cdn.anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
#19/1943.8%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #18Muse Glimmer51.2%
  3. #19Nex-N2.5-Mini43.8%
github.com · 2026-09-08
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
~#22/35~63.2%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #21GLM-5.3 Flash63.4%
  3. ~#22Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated63.2%
  4. #22Claude Opus 562.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#10/3468.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #9GPT-6 Sol69.0%
  3. #10Claude Opus 5.568.4%
  4. #10Kimi K368.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#33/3436.1%Lab-reported
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #32Laguna S 2.140.4%
  3. #33Nex-N2.5-Mini36.1%
  4. #34Hy328.0%
github.com · 2026-09-08
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#15/8832.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #13Step 5 Preview33.3%
  3. #15Claude Haiku 5.532.8%
  4. #15GLM-5.3 Flash32.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#2/8859.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#30/89~11.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #27Kimi K312.6%
  3. ~#30Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated11.7%
  4. #30Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B11.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#7/25~84.4%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #6gpt-oss-120b87.8%
  3. ~#7Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated84.4%
  4. #7Ternary Bonsai 27B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~91.9%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.9%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#8/25~80.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #7Ternary Bonsai 27B82.8%
  3. ~#8Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated80.3%
  4. #8Gemma 4 31B80.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#21/10555.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #20GPT-6.1 Sol55.7%
  3. #21Claude Haiku 5.555.0%
  4. #21GPT-5.6 Terra55.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#1/10566.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#37/106~49.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #36Inkling Small49.7%
  3. ~#37Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated49.7%
  4. #37Hy348.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
~#12/18~50.9Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #11Kimi K351.9
  3. ~#12Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated50.9
  4. #12Mistral Large 449.8
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/1766.0Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Gemini 4 Argon63.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#16/18~41.9Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #15DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)43.1
  3. ~#16Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated41.9
  4. #16Gemini 3.8 Flash41.9
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
MMMU-Pro
day 0
~#18/86~79.1%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #17Apodex 1.179.2%
  3. ~#18Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated79.1%
  4. #18Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite79.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/8587.7%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#3/9~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. ~#3Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated84.6%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 Flash-Next84.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#4/8~89.2%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated89.2%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
~#11/44~21.3%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #10Claude Opus 521.6%
  3. ~#11Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated21.3%
  4. #11GPT-5.521.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
#4/4326.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #4Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  3. #4Claude Opus 5.526.2%
  4. #6GPT-6 Sol24.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
Chartography
third-party
#4/2346.4%Lab-reported
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
  3. #4Claude Haiku 5.546.4%
  4. #5Claude Fable 5.146.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-10-07
#2/2366.3%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
GPQA Diamond
day 0
~#3/184~95.0%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated95.0%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro94.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/184~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#16/18444.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #15GPT-5.545.8%
  3. #16Claude Haiku 5.544.4%
  4. #17Grok 4.644.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#1/18461.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/32~97.9%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Haiku 5.5Estimated97.9%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/32~99.2%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated99.2%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
—
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#17/8543.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #16Kimi K343.6
  3. #17Claude Haiku 5.543.4
  4. #18GPT-5.6 Terra42.1
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#1/8557.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
—

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Nex-N2.5-Mini
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#2/118~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#49/118~50.1%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #48Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B53.2%
  3. ~#49Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated50.1%
  4. #49Solar Open 100B48.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
#9/1171.2%Lab-reported
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.0%
  3. #9Nex-N2.5-Mini71.2%
  4. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
github.com · 2026-09-08
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#2/5~58.6%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated58.6%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/5~48.5%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
  3. ~#4Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated48.5%
  4. #4GPT-5.547.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#2/18~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#13/1783.4%Lab-reported
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #12MiniMax-M383.5%
  3. #13Nex-N2.5-Mini83.4%
  4. #14Inkling77.1%
github.com · 2026-09-08
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#1/871866Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11758
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
~#26/88~1348Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #25K2 Horizon 375B A23B1349
  3. ~#26Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated1348
  4. #26GPT-5.51336
estimated from related benchmarks
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#1/8169.5%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#36/82~23.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #35Quasar 438B23.9%
  3. ~#36Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated23.7%
  4. #36MiniMax-M321.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
~#3/90~50.1%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5.5Estimated50.1%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#32/90~22.6%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #31Hy322.9%
  3. ~#32Nex-N2.5-MiniEstimated22.6%
  4. #32K2-Horizon-32B22.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (2)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
—
#1/381.8%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—
OSWorld 2.0 (release not stated)
day 0
—
—
#4/430.5%Lab-reported
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.366.9%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 Flash-Next52.3%
  3. #4Nex-N2.5-Mini30.5%
github.com · 2026-09-08