Skip to content
Model Pareto

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

MetaOpen weightsartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Compare with nearest rivalsCompare with…
Input
$0.345/M tok
Output
$0.345/M tok
Blended
$0.345/M tok · 3:1
Speed
15tok/s
Context
128Ktokens

Long-tail import from Artificial Analysis (2026-09-24); AA variant: Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). Price = AA median host price.

Rankings

Self-hostingEstimated

How we estimate →

What it would cost to run these open weights yourself on rented GPUs, compared with the API price above.

Hardware
1× B200 180GB
BF16 weights
Throughput
~9,135 tok/s
many requests batched
Price
$0.094–0.84 /M tok
busy → light use
On your own machine
RTX 5090 32GB (int4, ~230 tok/s single-stream)
single consumer GPU or Mac
Assumptions (5)
  • BF16 weights (10.7B params) + 25% KV-cache headroom ≈ 27 GB
  • 1× B200 180GB at $5.98–$14.24/GPU-hour on-demand (2026-09-24)
  • ~9,135 output tok/s aggregate at batch 256 (bandwidth-bound)
  • Blended 3:1 input:output; prefill ~49,679 tok/s
  • Low = 75% utilization at the low GPU price; high = 20% at the high price

Benchmark scores

~ italic, dashed = no published score yet, estimated from related benchmarks.

Writing & chat

MMMLUEstimated
~last of 5 (estimated)below measured range (<81.3%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
  3. #4gpt-oss-120b81.3%
  4. ~#5Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated<81.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)Estimated
~#51 of 54 (estimated)~1286 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #50Ring-flash-2.0Few votes1293
  4. ~#51Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated1286
  5. #51NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B1286
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text (Elo)Estimated
~#51 of 54 (estimated)~1314 Elo
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #50gpt-oss-20b1317
  4. ~#51Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated1314
  5. #51NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B1314
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Vision

MMMUEstimated
~#2 of 3 (estimated)~71.3%
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv ReasoningEstimated
~last of 9 (estimated)below measured range (<74.5%)
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #2Kimi K384.8%
  3. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.5%
  4. ~#9Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated<74.5%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5Estimated
~last of 8 (estimated)below measured range (<75.8%)
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Kimi K391.1%
  3. #7Muse Glimmer75.8%
  4. ~#8Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated<75.8%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)Estimated
~#41 of 43 (estimated)~0.1%
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #40Ministral 3 8B0.8%
  4. ~#41Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated0.1%
  5. #41Ministral 3 3B0.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
ChartographyEstimated
~last of 23 (estimated)below measured range (<9.0%)
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #22Mistral Large 39.0%
  4. ~#23Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated<9.0%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning

AIME (latest)Estimated
~#21 of 25 (estimated)~20.1%
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
  3. #20Ministral 3 3B22.0%
  4. ~#21Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated20.1%
  5. #21Llama 4 Maverick19.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks

Agents

OSWorld-VerifiedEstimated
~#11 of 12 (estimated)~61.9%
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. #10Muse Glimmer65.9%
  4. ~#11Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated61.9%
  5. #11Claude Haiku 4.550.7%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0Estimated
~#3 of 5 (estimated)~53.8%
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated53.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks
τ-Bench Banking (AA)Estimated
~last of 89 (estimated)below measured range (<3.3%)
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. #88Llama 4 Scout3.3%
  4. ~#89Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Estimated<3.3%
No published score — estimated from related benchmarks