Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Intern-S2-397BMiMo-V2.6-ProGPT-5.5
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Intern-S2-397B
    Quality
    54.0
    Rank
    #29/103
    Price
    —
    Speed
    —

    vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: −23.8 quality · price n/a

  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro
    Quality
    77.8
    Rank
    #7/103
    Price
    $0.54/M tok
    Speed
    49tok/s
    In$0.435▾Out$0.87▾/M tok

    vs GPT-5.5: +17.6 quality · 0.05× price

  • GPT-5.5
    Quality
    60.2
    Rank
    #22/103
    Price
    $11.3/M tok
    Speed
    91tok/s
    In$5.00Out$30/M tok

    vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: −17.6 quality · 21× price

Overview

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
Lab
Shanghai AI Lab (Intern)
Xiaomi MiMo
OpenAI
Released
Sep 13, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Apr 23, 2026
Weights
Open
Open
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
—
$0.435Best
$5.00
Output price
$/M tok
—
$0.87Best
$30
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$0.544Best
$11.3
Output speed
tok/s
—
49
91Best
Context
tokens
262K
1MBest
922K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
Coding
54.1±8.5
#29/103Lab-reported
77.9±6.4Best
#7/103Mixedbest value
60.2±5.2
#22/103Mixed
Writing & chat
Not ranked
81.8±6.0Best
#11/146Verifiedbest value
77.0±3.3
#16/146Verified
Vision
75.3±8.7
#13/82Lab-reported
76.5±9.4Best
#12/82Verified
74.4±4.8
#14/82Verified
Hard reasoning
Not ranked
86.1±5.1Best
#7/182Verifiedbest value
79.9±3.7
#17/182Verified
Agents
Not ranked
84.4±6.4Best
#9/173Mixed
67.4±3.2
#26/173Mixed

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#3/14~82.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. ~#3Intern-S2-397BEstimated82.3%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro80.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~89.6%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated89.6%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/14~82.9%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
  3. ~#3GPT-5.5Estimated82.9%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro80.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
#5/1868.5%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  4. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-13
~#5/19~71.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. ~#5MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated71.8%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#12/1858.6%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #11MiniMax-M359.0%
  3. #12GPT-5.558.6%
  4. #13Hy357.9%
openai.com · 2026-04-23
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
~#27/31~54.8%Estimated
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #26Nex-N2.5-Pro55.8%
  3. ~#27Intern-S2-397BEstimated54.8%
  4. #27Qwen3.8 Max (0902)51.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
#3/3071.9%BestLab-reported
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #2Grok 4.772.6%
  3. #3MiMo-V2.6-Pro71.9%
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.371.7%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-21
#13/3067.0%Lab-reported
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #12GPT-6 Astra67.6%
  3. #13GPT-5.567.0%
  4. #14Gemini 3.8 Flash65.8%
openai.com · 2026-07-09
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
~#19/84~18.2%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #18Gemini 3.8 Flash19.7%
  3. ~#19Intern-S2-397BEstimated18.2%
  4. #19Grok 4.617.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
#10/8334.8%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #9GPT-5.6 Terra35.4%
  3. #10MiMo-V2.6-Pro34.8%
  4. #11Muse Spark 1.333.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#20/8314.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #19Grok 4.617.2%
  3. #20GPT-5.514.6%
  4. #21Claude Sonnet 514.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#6/20~85.2%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #5gpt-oss-120b87.8%
  3. ~#6Intern-S2-397BEstimated85.2%
  4. #6Gemma 4 31B80.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~92.1%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated92.1%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/20~90.6%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
  3. ~#3GPT-5.5Estimated90.6%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 27B90.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#34/9547.6%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #33Kimi K2.7 Code47.8%
  3. #34Intern-S2-397B47.6%
  4. #35GPT-5.4 nano47.2%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-13
#4/9560.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #3Claude Sonnet 5.561.0%
  3. #4MiMo-V2.6-Pro60.9%
  4. #5Kimi K359.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#15/9555.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #14Claude Opus 556.4%
  3. #15GPT-5.555.8%
  4. #16GPT-5.6 Terra55.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
~#13/15~42.1Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #12DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)43.1
  3. ~#13Intern-S2-397BEstimated42.1
  4. #13Gemini 3.8 Flash41.9
estimated from related benchmarks
~#7/15~55.0Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #6Grok 4.756.3
  3. ~#7MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated55.0
  4. #7Muse Spark 1.354.3
estimated from related benchmarks
~#10/15~48.9Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #9Kimi K351.9
  3. ~#10GPT-5.5Estimated48.9
  4. #10Grok 4.647.0
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
IFBench
day 0
—
~#4/126~81.5%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
  3. ~#4MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated81.5%
  4. #4Nemotron 3 Ultra81.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
#15/12575.9%Verified
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #15GPT-5.4 nano75.9%
  3. #15GPT-5.575.9%
  4. #17Qwen3.5 122B A10B75.7%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
MMMLU
day 0
—
~#2/5~90.9%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated90.9%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~91.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-5.5Estimated91.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
—
#13/531461Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #12DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1462
  3. #13MiMo-V2.6-Pro1461
  4. #14GPT-6 AstraFew votes1460
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#8/531474BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #7Kimi K31477
  3. #8GPT-5.51474
  4. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1467
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
—
#10/531480Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #10GPT-6 AstraFew votes1480
  3. #10MiMo-V2.6-Pro1480
  4. #13DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1477
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#8/531482BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #7Gemini 3.1 Pro1487
  3. #8GPT-5.51482
  4. #9Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1481
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
—
~#9/26~1966Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #8Grok 4.72007
  3. ~#9MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated1966
  4. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
estimated from related benchmarks
#11/251844Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #10GPT-5.6 Terra1855
  3. #11GPT-5.51844
  4. #12Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1843
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Intern-S2-397BEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2GPT-5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
#9/7681.7%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #8Muse Spark 1.382.0%
  3. #9Intern-S2-397B81.7%
  4. #10GPT-5.6 Terra80.7%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-13
~#4/77~85.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #3Gemini 3.8 Flash85.6%
  3. ~#4MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated85.3%
  4. #4Claude Opus 584.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
#13/7679.9%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #11Qwen3.7 Plus80.5%
  3. #13GPT-5.579.9%
  4. #14Qwen3.8 Flash-Next79.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#5/9~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
  3. ~#5Intern-S2-397BEstimated82.8%
  4. #5Muse Glimmer78.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/9~84.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 Flash-Next84.6%
  3. ~#4MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated84.1%
  4. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#5/9~83.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
  3. ~#5GPT-5.5Estimated83.3%
  4. #5Muse Glimmer78.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#4/8~88.5%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Intern-S2-397BEstimated88.5%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~90.1%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated90.1%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~89.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4GPT-5.5Estimated89.8%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
~#15/43~18.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #14MiMo-V2.6-Pro19.2%
  3. ~#15Intern-S2-397BEstimated18.1%
  4. #15Gemini 3.1 Pro17.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
#14/4219.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #13Grok 4.720.0%
  3. #14MiMo-V2.6-Pro19.2%
  4. #15Gemini 3.1 Pro17.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#10/4221.2%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #9Claude Opus 521.6%
  3. #10GPT-5.521.2%
  4. #11Gemini 3.8 Flash21.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
~#7/23~33.8%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #6GPT-5.6 Terra34.0%
  3. ~#7Intern-S2-397BEstimated33.8%
  4. #7GPT-5.531.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#7/23~32.0%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #6GPT-5.6 Terra34.0%
  3. ~#7MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated32.0%
  4. #7GPT-5.531.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
#7/2231.0%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #6GPT-5.6 Terra34.0%
  3. #7GPT-5.531.0%
  4. #8GPT-6 Luna29.1%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
GPQA Diamond
day 0
—
~#2/173~95.5%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated95.5%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
#5/17293.5%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #4Claude Fable 5.193.7%
  3. #5GPT-5.593.5%
  4. #5Grok 4.693.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
—
#6/17849.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #5GPT-6 Astra54.7%
  3. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro49.4%
  4. #7Muse Spark 1.348.7%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#13/17845.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #12Step 5 Preview46.5%
  3. #13GPT-5.545.8%
  4. #14Grok 4.644.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
—
~#2/25~96.5%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated96.5%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.8%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2GPT-5.5Estimated96.8%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
—
#9/7446.3BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #8Grok 4.746.4
  3. #9MiMo-V2.6-Pro46.3
  4. #10Qwen3.8 Max (0902)45.4
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#21/7438.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash39.5
  3. #21GPT-5.538.4
  4. #22Claude Sonnet 538.2
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Intern-S2-397B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPT-5.5
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#2/116~98.1%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated98.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
#6/11593.9%Verified
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #5Mistral Medium 3.594.2%
  3. #6GPT-5.593.9%
  4. #7Qwen3.5 122B A10B93.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
#4/1182.0%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
  3. #4MiMo-V2.6-Pro82.0%
  4. #5Claude Sonnet 581.2%
huggingface.co · 2026-09-21
#7/1178.7%Lab-reported
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #6MiMo-V2.6-Flash80.8%
  3. #7GPT-5.578.7%
  4. #8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite74.0%
openai.com · 2026-04-23
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#3/5~56.9%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated56.9%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
#4/447.5%Lab-reported
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
  3. #4GPT-5.547.5%
openai.com · 2026-07-09
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#5/18~90.7%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #4Claude Opus 590.8%
  3. ~#5MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated90.7%
  4. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
#10/1784.4%Lab-reported
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #9Claude Sonnet 584.7%
  3. #10GPT-5.584.4%
  4. #11Hy384.2%
openai.com · 2026-04-23
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#6/861673BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #5Muse Spark 1.31674
  3. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro1673
  4. #7Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1668
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#25/861336Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #24K2 Horizon 375B A23B1349
  3. #25GPT-5.51336
  4. #26MiniMax-M31230
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#12/7958.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #11Claude Fable 5.159.4%
  3. #12MiMo-V2.6-Pro58.6%
  4. #13Kimi K358.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#23/7947.3%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #22Qwen3.8 27B48.2%
  3. #23GPT-5.547.3%
  4. #24K2 Horizon 375B A23B37.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
~#11/89~44.5%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #10Gemini 3.8 Flash44.9%
  3. ~#11MiMo-V2.6-ProEstimated44.5%
  4. #11Grok 4.643.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
#16/8839.0%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #15DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)39.6%
  3. #16GPT-5.539.0%
  4. #17Claude Sonnet 537.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24