Skip to content
Model Pareto

Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.7 scores higher in coding and agents; Grok 4.6 in writing & chat, vision and hard reasoning. Both cost about $3.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output.
Grok 4.7Grok 4.6
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 101 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Grok 4.7
    Quality
    72.7
    Rank
    #11/103
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    40tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$6.00▾/M tok

    vs Grok 4.6: +13.7 quality · 1× price

  • Grok 4.6
    Quality
    59.0
    Rank
    #25/103
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    60tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$6.00▾/M tok

    vs Grok 4.7: −13.7 quality · 1× price

Overview

Lab
SpaceXAI (xAI)
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Released
Sep 21, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$2.00Best
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$6.00Best
$6.00Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$3.00Best
$3.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
40
60Best
Context
tokens
500KBest
500KBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

72.7±4.5Best
#11/103Verified
59.0±4.5
#25/103Verified
70.9±4.3
#25/146Verified
72.0±6.0Best
#22/146Verified
64.1±7.3
#23/82Verified
65.2±7.3Best
#21/82Verified
81.8±5.1
#14/182Verified
82.2±3.7Best
#12/182Verified
86.7±7.8Best
#5/173Verified
84.1±5.8
#10/173Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~87.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~88.2%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/116~96.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~97.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~82.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~82.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks