Skip to content
Model Pareto

Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Claude Opus 5 scores higher in coding, writing & chat and hard reasoning; Muse Spark 1.3 in vision and agents. Claude Opus 5 costs 5× as much as Muse Spark 1.3 ($10.0 vs $2.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.3
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 101 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Opus 5
    Quality
    83.3
    Rank
    #5/103
    Price
    $10.0/M tok
    Speed
    54tok/s
    In$5.00Out$25/M tok

    vs Muse Spark 1.3: +8.4 quality · 5× price

  • Muse Spark 1.3
    Quality
    74.9
    Rank
    #8/103
    Price
    $2.00/M tok
    Speed
    219tok/s
    In$1.25▾Out$4.25▾/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5: −8.4 quality · 0.2× price

Overview

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
Lab
Anthropic
Meta
Released
Jul 24, 2026
Sep 2, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$5.00
$1.25Best
Output price
$/M tok
$25
$4.25Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$10
$2.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
54
219Best
Context
tokens
1MBest
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
Coding
83.3±3.2Best
#5/103Mixed
74.9±4.5
#8/103Verified
Writing & chat
93.4±4.3Best
#2/146Verifiedbest value
82.3±4.7
#10/146Verified
Vision
77.4±4.8
#9/82Verified
79.1±4.8Best
#6/82Verified
Hard reasoning
91.7±3.7Best
#5/182Verified
86.9±3.7
#6/182Verifiedbest value
Agents
84.8±4.6
#8/173Mixed
87.4±5.8Best
#3/173Verifiedbest value

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
#1/1396.0%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-07-24
~#2/14~88.2%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated88.2%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
#4/1879.2%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
  3. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
anthropic.com · 2026-07-24
~#5/19~70.5%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. ~#5Muse Spark 1.3Estimated70.5%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#20/3062.5%Verified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #19GLM-5.3 Flash63.4%
  3. #20Claude Opus 562.5%
  4. #21GLM-5.361.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#4/3071.7%BestVerified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #3MiMo-V2.6-Pro71.9%
  3. #4Muse Spark 1.371.7%
  4. #5Claude Sonnet 5.571.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#5/8349.0%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #4Claude Fable 5.152.0%
  3. #5Claude Opus 549.0%
  4. #6GPT-6 Sol43.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#11/8333.3%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #10MiMo-V2.6-Pro34.8%
  3. #11Muse Spark 1.333.3%
  4. #11Step 5 Preview33.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#3/20~91.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5Estimated91.3%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 27B90.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated92.2%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#14/9556.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #13GPT-6 Astra56.5%
  3. #14Claude Opus 556.4%
  4. #15GPT-5.555.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#8/9558.8%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #7Step 5 Preview58.9%
  3. #8Muse Spark 1.358.8%
  4. #9Gemini 3.1 Pro58.7%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
#4/1459.7BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #3GPT-6 Astra61.6
  3. #4Claude Opus 559.7
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol56.7
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#7/1454.3Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #6Grok 4.756.3
  3. #7Muse Spark 1.354.3
  4. #8GLM-5.353.6
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
IFBench
day 0
~#3/126~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5Estimated82.8%
  4. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/126~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. ~#3Muse Spark 1.3Estimated82.8%
  4. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLU
day 0
~#2/5~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5Estimated92.2%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~92.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated92.1%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
#4/531483Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #3Muse Spark 1.3Few votes1487
  3. #4Claude Opus 51483
  4. #4Gemini 3.8 FlashFew votes1483
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#3/531487BestVerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #3Muse Spark 1.3Few votes1487
  4. #4Claude Opus 51483
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
#3/531493BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #3Claude Opus 51493
  4. #3Gemini 3.8 Flash1493
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
#3/531493BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #3Gemini 3.8 Flash1493
  3. #3Muse Spark 1.31493
  4. #6Kimi K31488
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
#3/252133BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #3Claude Opus 52133
  4. #4GPT-6 Sol2125
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
#9/251906Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #8Grok 4.72007
  3. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
  4. #10GPT-5.6 Terra1855
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
#4/7684.7%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #3Gemini 3.8 Flash85.6%
  3. #4Claude Opus 584.7%
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol83.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#8/7682.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #7Gemini 3.1 Pro82.4%
  3. #8Muse Spark 1.382.0%
  4. #9Intern-S2-397B81.7%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#2/9~84.9%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5Estimated84.9%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/9~84.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 Flash-Next84.6%
  3. ~#4Muse Spark 1.3Estimated84.1%
  4. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#4/8~90.7%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Claude Opus 5Estimated90.7%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~90.5%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Muse Spark 1.3Estimated90.5%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
#9/4221.6%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #8Kimi K322.0%
  3. #9Claude Opus 521.6%
  4. #10GPT-5.521.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#2/4226.6%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.126.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
#11/2227.3%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #10Muse Spark 1.327.6%
  3. #11Claude Opus 527.3%
  4. #12Kimi K326.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
#10/2227.6%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #8Qwen3.8 Max (0902)29.1%
  3. #10Muse Spark 1.327.6%
  4. #11Claude Opus 527.3%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond
day 0
#11/17293.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #5Step 5 Preview93.5%
  3. #11Claude Opus 593.2%
  4. #12MiniMax-M392.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#5/17293.5%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #5Kimi K393.5%
  3. #5Muse Spark 1.393.5%
  4. #5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B93.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#4/17854.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #3Claude Sonnet 5.555.0%
  3. #4Claude Opus 554.9%
  4. #5GPT-6 Astra54.7%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#7/17848.7%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro49.4%
  3. #7Muse Spark 1.348.7%
  4. #8GPT-6 Sol47.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/25~96.9%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5Estimated96.9%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.8%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated96.8%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#5/7450.8BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #4GPT-6 Astra52.7
  3. #5Claude Opus 550.8
  4. #6Muse Spark 1.348.1
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#6/7448.1Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #5Claude Opus 550.8
  3. #6Muse Spark 1.348.1
  4. #7GPT-6 Sol47.5
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Opus 5
Muse Spark 1.3
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Muse Spark 1.3Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
~#3/12~84.0%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5Estimated84.0%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~84.2%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Muse Spark 1.3Estimated84.2%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
~#3/5~55.3%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5Estimated55.3%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/5~57.8%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Muse Spark 1.3Estimated57.8%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
#4/1790.8%Lab-reported
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #3Kimi K391.2%
  3. #4Claude Opus 590.8%
  4. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-07-24
~#3/18~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. ~#3Muse Spark 1.3Estimated91.4%
  4. #3Kimi K391.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
#3/861708BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #3Claude Opus 51708
  4. #4Grok 4.71695
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#5/861674Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #4Grok 4.71695
  3. #5Muse Spark 1.31674
  4. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro1673
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
#17/7956.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #16DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)56.7%
  3. #17Claude Opus 556.6%
  4. #18Qwen3.8 Max (0902)56.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#14/7957.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #13Kimi K358.3%
  3. #14Muse Spark 1.357.9%
  4. #15Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B57.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
#12/8842.1%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #11Grok 4.643.3%
  3. #12Claude Opus 542.1%
  4. #13GPT-6 Astra41.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/8850.5%BestVerified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Not comparable across labs (2)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
#3/374.0%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
  3. #3Claude Opus 574.0%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—
OSWorld 2.0 (release not stated)
day 0
—
#1/466.9%Lab-reported
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.366.9%
  2. #2Nex-N2.5-Pro56.4%
dev.meta.ai · 2026-09-02