Skip to content
Model Pareto

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher than Claude Haiku 4.5 in all 3 shared categories. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 10× as much as Claude Haiku 5.5 ($2.00 vs $0.20 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 4.5
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 117 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Nex-N2.5-Mini, Nex-N2.5-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5. 34 models are not plotted: GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

34 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Haiku 5.5
    Quality
    66.2
    Rank
    #19/119
    Price
    $0.20/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$0.10▾Out$0.50▾/M tok

    vs Claude Haiku 4.5: +34.2 quality · 0.1× price

  • Claude Haiku 4.5
    Quality
    32.0
    Rank
    #79/119
    Price
    $2.00/M tok
    Speed
    109tok/s
    In$1.00Out$5.00/M tok

    vs Claude Haiku 5.5: −34.2 quality · 10× price

Overview

Lab
Anthropic
Anthropic
Released
Oct 7, 2026
Oct 15, 2025
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$0.10Best
$1.00
Output price
$/M tok
$0.50Best
$5.00
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$0.20Best
$2.00
Output speed
tok/s
—
109
Context
tokens
1MBest
200K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

66.2±8.0Best
#19/119Verified
32.1±5.3
#79/119Mixed
Not ranked
47.6±3.8
#72/156Mixed
78.7±9.7Best
#7/91Lab-reportedbest value
36.2±4.1
#66/91Mixed
81.3±5.1Best
#17/200Verifiedbest value
40.8±3.4
#103/200Verified
Not ranked
22.3±3.5
#117/178Mixed

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/18below measured range (<41.1)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~last/9below measured range (<74.5%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Chartography
third-party
~last/24below measured range (<9.0%)Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.