Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 100 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 26 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

26 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Fable 5.1
    Quality
    87.5
    Rank
    #3/103
    Price
    $20.0/M tok
    Speed
    66tok/s
    In$10Out$50/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −9.3 quality · 2.5× price

  • GPT-6 Astra
    Quality
    86.2
    Rank
    #4/103
    Price
    $20.0/M tok
    Speed
    52tok/s
    In$10Out$50/M tok

    vs Claude Opus 5.5: −10.7 quality · 2.5× price

  • Claude Opus 5.5
    Quality
    96.9
    Rank
    #1/103
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    92tok/s
    In$4.00▾Out$20▾/M tok

    vs Claude Fable 5.1: +9.3 quality · 0.4× price

Overview

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
Lab
Anthropic
OpenAI
Anthropic
Released
Sep 1, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$10
$10
$4.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$50
$50
$20Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$20
$20
$8.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
66
52
92Best
Context
tokens
1MBest
1MBest
1MBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
Coding
87.6±3.7
#3/103Mixed
86.2±4.5
#4/103Verified
96.9±3.4Best
#1/103Mixedbest value
Writing & chat
97.6±3.5Best
#1/146Verifiedbest value
92.1±5.3
#4/146Verified
93.0±4.3
#3/146Verifiedbest value
Vision
87.4±7.3
#3/82Verified
98.9±3.0Best
#1/82Verifiedbest value
94.5±4.8
#2/82Verifiedbest value
Hard reasoning
95.7±3.7
#2/182Verified
93.5±3.7
#4/182Verified
99.9±2.6Best
#1/182Verifiedbest value
Agents
89.6±5.8
#2/173Verified
81.6±4.6
#15/173Mixed
99.6±4.1Best
#1/173Verifiedbest value

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/14~93.5%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated93.5%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~90.0%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated90.0%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~94.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated94.7%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
#3/1881.2%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
  4. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-01
~#5/19~75.1%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. ~#5GPT-6 AstraEstimated75.1%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/1889.9%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
www-cdn.anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#16/3064.3%Verified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #15Grok 4.664.9%
  3. #16Claude Fable 5.164.3%
  4. #16Hy4 preview64.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#12/3067.6%Verified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #11Step 5 Preview67.7%
  3. #12GPT-6 Astra67.6%
  4. #13GPT-5.567.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#8/3068.4%BestVerified
  1. #1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  2. #7GPT-6 Sol69.0%
  3. #8Claude Opus 5.568.4%
  4. #8Kimi K368.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#4/8352.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.152.0%
  4. #5Claude Opus 549.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#3/8359.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
  4. #4Claude Fable 5.152.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#2/8359.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/20~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated92.2%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated92.3%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#2/9563.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
  3. #3Claude Sonnet 5.561.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#13/9556.5%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #12Gemini 3.8 Flash56.6%
  3. #13GPT-6 Astra56.5%
  4. #14Claude Opus 556.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/9566.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
#2/1462.2Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra61.6
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#3/1461.6Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra61.6
  4. #4Claude Opus 559.7
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/1466.0BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.162.2
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
IFBench
day 0
~#2/126~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated82.8%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/126~81.9%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. ~#3GPT-6 AstraEstimated81.9%
  4. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/126~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated82.8%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLU
day 0
~#2/5~92.4%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated92.4%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated91.4%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
#2/531496VerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #3Muse Spark 1.3Few votes1487
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#14/531460VerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #13MiMo-V2.6-Pro1461
  3. #14GPT-6 AstraFew votes1460
  4. #15GPT-5.6 Terra1456
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/531501BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51501
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
#2/531501Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
  3. #3Claude Opus 51493
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#10/531480VerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #10GLM-5.31480
  3. #10GPT-6 AstraFew votes1480
  4. #10MiMo-V2.6-Pro1480
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/531509BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51509
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11501
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
#2/252162Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #3Claude Opus 52133
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
#1/252173BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
#7/252050Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #6GLM-5.32075
  3. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
  4. #8Grok 4.72007
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
~#2/77~87.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated87.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
#2/7686.9%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
  3. #3Gemini 3.8 Flash85.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/7687.7%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
~#2/9~86.0%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated86.0%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
~#2/8~91.2%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated91.2%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
#3/4226.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  4. #3Claude Opus 5.526.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/4231.0%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #2Muse Spark 1.326.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#3/4226.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.526.2%
  4. #5GPT-6 Sol24.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
#4/2246.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.146.2%
  4. #5Gemini 3.8 Flash40.9%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/2271.0%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
#2/2266.3%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
GPQA Diamond
day 0
#4/17293.7%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro94.1%
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.193.7%
  4. #5GPT-5.593.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/17296.1%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#2/173~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#2/17859.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
  3. #3Claude Sonnet 5.555.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#5/17854.7%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #4Claude Opus 554.9%
  3. #5GPT-6 Astra54.7%
  4. #6MiMo-V2.6-Pro49.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/17861.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/25~96.9%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated96.9%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.9%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated96.9%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.7%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.7%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#3/7453.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.153.4
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra52.7
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#4/7452.7Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.153.4
  3. #4GPT-6 Astra52.7
  4. #5Claude Opus 550.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/7457.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Claude Opus 5.5
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2GPT-6 AstraEstimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~83.4%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3GPT-6 AstraEstimated83.4%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
~#3/5~58.0%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Fable 5.1Estimated58.0%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/5~55.0%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3GPT-6 AstraEstimated55.0%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.7%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated58.7%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
~#2/18~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated92.2%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
#2/1791.5%Lab-reported
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
  3. #3Kimi K391.2%
openai.com · 2026-09-03
~#2/18~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
#2/861735Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
  3. #3Claude Opus 51708
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#15/861542Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #14Step 5 Preview1566
  3. #15GPT-6 Astra1542
  4. #16Kimi K31524
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/861846BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11735
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
#11/7959.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #10GPT-5.6 Terra59.6%
  3. #11Claude Fable 5.159.4%
  4. #12MiMo-V2.6-Pro58.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#3/7968.5%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra68.5%
  4. #4Grok 4.667.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/7969.5%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
#6/8847.2%BestVerified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)47.8%
  3. #6Claude Fable 5.147.2%
  4. #6GLM-5.3 Flash47.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#13/8841.4%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #12Claude Opus 542.1%
  3. #13GPT-6 Astra41.4%
  4. #14GPT-5.6 Terra40.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#3/89~50.0%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5.5Estimated50.0%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (2)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
#2/380.7%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
  3. #3Claude Opus 574.0%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—
#1/381.8%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (offline set v2026.08.08)
day 0
—
#1/372.6%Lab-reported
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra72.6%
  2. #2GPT-6 Sol64.4%
openai.com · 2026-09-03
—