Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
BorealClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7Up to 4 models — remove one to add another.

Overview

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
Lab
Creatify
Anthropic
Anthropic
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Released
Sep 15, 2026
Sep 1, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
—
$10
$4.00
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
—
$50
$20
$6.00Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
—
$20
$8.00
$3.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
48
92Best
76
Context
tokens
—
1MBest
1MBest
500K
Price per second
1080p
$0.010
—
—
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
Coding
Not ranked
86.2±3.6
#4/119Mixed
95.7±3.6Best
#1/119Mixedbest value
70.5±4.5
#15/119Verified
Writing & chat
Not ranked
94.4±4.6Best
#2/156Verified
88.3±4.3
#5/156Verified
68.7±4.3
#30/156Verified
Vision
Not ranked
86.7±7.3
#4/91Verified
94.0±4.8Best
#2/91Verifiedbest value
64.6±4.8
#29/91Verified
Hard reasoning
Not ranked
95.7±3.7
#2/200Verified
99.9±2.6Best
#1/200Verifiedbest value
81.4±5.1
#16/200Verified
Agents
Not ranked
89.8±5.8
#2/178Verified
99.6±4.1Best
#1/178Verifiedbest value
87.1±7.8
#3/178Verifiedbest value
Video generation
14.7±7.5
#34/36Verifiedbest value
Not ranked
Not ranked
Not ranked

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
—
~#2/14~93.5%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated93.5%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~94.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated94.7%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~85.9%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated85.9%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
—
#3/1981.2%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
  4. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-01
#1/1989.9%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
www-cdn.anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
~#6/20~68.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  3. ~#6Grok 4.7Estimated68.3%
  4. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
—
#18/3464.3%Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #17Grok 4.664.9%
  3. #18Claude Fable 5.164.3%
  4. #18Hy4 preview64.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#10/3468.4%Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #9GPT-6 Sol69.0%
  3. #10Claude Opus 5.568.4%
  4. #10Kimi K368.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#4/3472.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #3GPT-6.1 Sol73.2%
  3. #4Grok 4.772.6%
  4. #5MiMo-V2.6-Pro71.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
—
#6/8852.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #5GPT-6.1 Sol56.1%
  3. #6Claude Fable 5.152.0%
  4. #7Claude Opus 549.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#2/8859.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
  3. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#19/8825.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #18DeepSeek V4.1 Flash26.8%
  3. #19Grok 4.725.8%
  4. #20Qwen3.8 Flash-Next25.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
—
~#4/25~90.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 27B90.3%
  3. ~#4Claude Fable 5.1Estimated90.3%
  4. #4Ternary Bonsai 2 27B90.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~91.9%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.9%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#7/25~83.8%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #6gpt-oss-120b87.8%
  3. ~#7Grok 4.7Estimated83.8%
  4. #7Ternary Bonsai 27B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
—
#2/10563.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
  3. #3Gemini 4 Argon61.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/10566.9%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#14/10557.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #13GPT-6 Sol57.6%
  3. #14Grok 4.757.4%
  4. #15Gemini 3.8 Flash56.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
—
#4/1762.2Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #3GPT-6.1 Sol62.9
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.162.2
  4. #5GPT-6 Astra61.6
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/1766.0BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Gemini 4 Argon63.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#8/1756.3Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #7GPT-6 Sol56.7
  3. #8Grok 4.756.3
  4. #9Muse Spark 1.354.3
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
IFBench
day 0
—
~#2/134~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated82.8%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/134~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated82.8%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#26/134~72.9%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #25GPT-5.4 mini73.3%
  3. ~#26Grok 4.7Estimated72.9%
  4. #26Gemma 4 26B A4B72.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLU
day 0
—
~#2/5~92.4%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated92.4%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~89.6%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated89.6%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
—
#2/561496BestVerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Gemini 4 ArgonFew votes1512
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.51494
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#3/561494Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 ArgonFew votes1512
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
  3. #3Claude Opus 5.51494
  4. #4Muse Spark 1.3Few votes1487
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
#29/561435Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 ArgonFew votes1512
  2. #28GPT-6 Luna1436
  3. #29Grok 4.71435
  4. #30Qwen3.5 397B A17B1434
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
—
#3/561501Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon1525
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.51504
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.11501
  4. #4Gemini 3.8 Flash1493
lmarena.ai · 2026-09-25
#2/561504BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon1525
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.51504
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.11501
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
#28/561442Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon1525
  2. #28GPT-6 Luna1442
  3. #28Grok 4.71442
  4. #28Qwen3.5 397B A17B1442
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
—
#2/252162BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.12162
  3. #3Claude Opus 52133
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
#7/252050Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #6GLM-5.32075
  3. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
  4. #8Grok 4.72007
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24
#8/252007Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
  3. #8Grok 4.72007
  4. #9Muse Spark 1.31906
eqbench.com · 2026-09-24

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
MMMU
day 0
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
—
~#2/86~87.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated87.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
#1/8587.7%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#23/8578.2%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #22Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP478.3%
  3. #23Grok 4.778.2%
  4. #24Claude Sonnet 577.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
—
~#2/9~86.0%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated86.0%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/9~86.1%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated86.1%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#5/9~81.2%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
  3. ~#5Grok 4.7Estimated81.2%
  4. #5Muse Glimmer78.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
—
~#2/8~91.2%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated91.2%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated91.4%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~87.1%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Grok 4.7Estimated87.1%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
#4/4326.2%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #3Muse Spark 1.326.6%
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  4. #4Claude Opus 5.526.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#4/4326.2%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #4Claude Fable 5.126.2%
  3. #4Claude Opus 5.526.2%
  4. #6GPT-6 Sol24.8%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#14/4320.0%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #13GPT-6 Luna20.4%
  3. #14Grok 4.720.0%
  4. #15MiMo-V2.6-Pro19.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
—
#5/2346.2%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #4Claude Haiku 5.546.4%
  3. #5Claude Fable 5.146.2%
  4. #6Gemini 3.8 Flash40.9%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
#2/2366.3%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.566.3%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24
#19/2314.7%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #18GLM-5.3 Flash16.3%
  3. #19Grok 4.714.7%
  4. #20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash11.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
GPQA Diamond
day 0
—
#4/18393.7%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro94.1%
  3. #4Claude Fable 5.193.7%
  4. #5GPT-5.593.5%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#2/184~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#17/184~92.4%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #16GPT-5.6 Terra92.5%
  3. ~#17Grok 4.7Estimated92.4%
  4. #17Hy4 preview92.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
—
#2/18459.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
  3. #3Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/18461.4%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#19/18443.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #18Hy4 preview43.4%
  3. #19Grok 4.743.1%
  4. #19Qwen3.8 Max (0902)43.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
—
~#2/32~99.4%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated99.4%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/32~99.2%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated99.2%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/32~95.9%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. #2Inkling97.1%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated95.9%
  4. #3Ternary Bonsai 2 27B95.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
—
#3/8553.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.153.4
  4. #4GPT-6 Astra52.7
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/8557.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#10/8546.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #9GPT-6 Sol47.5
  3. #10Grok 4.746.4
  4. #11MiMo-V2.6-Pro46.3
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#2/118~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated98.3%
  3. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/118~98.3%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated98.3%
  3. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/118~97.9%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated97.9%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/12~84.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated84.6%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/12~82.6%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated82.6%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#3/5~58.0%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Fable 5.1Estimated58.0%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.6%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated58.6%
  3. #2Kimi K358.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/5~58.3%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated58.3%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#2/18~92.2%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Fable 5.1Estimated92.2%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/18~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. ~#2Claude Opus 5.5Estimated92.3%
  3. #2GPT-6 Astra91.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#6/18~89.0%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
  3. ~#6Grok 4.7Estimated89.0%
  4. #6Step 5 Preview88.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#2/871758Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11758
  3. #3Claude Opus 51724
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#1/871866BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.11758
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#4/871715Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #3Claude Opus 51724
  3. #4Grok 4.71715
  4. #5MiMo-V2.6-Pro1686
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#13/8159.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #12GPT-5.6 Terra59.6%
  3. #13Claude Fable 5.159.4%
  4. #14MiMo-V2.6-Pro58.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#1/8169.5%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash68.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
#6/8165.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #5GPT-6.1 Sol66.6%
  3. #6Grok 4.765.6%
  4. #7GLM-5.362.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
#6/8947.2%Verified
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)47.8%
  3. #6Claude Fable 5.147.2%
  4. #6GLM-5.3 Flash47.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
~#3/90~50.1%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #2GLM-5.350.3%
  3. ~#3Claude Opus 5.5Estimated50.1%
  4. #3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B49.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#11/90~43.6%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #10Gemini 3.8 Flash44.9%
  3. ~#11Grok 4.7Estimated43.6%
  4. #11Grok 4.643.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (1)
OSWorld 2.0 (Sept 2026 release)
day 0
—
#2/380.7%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
  3. #3Claude Opus 574.0%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
#1/381.8%BestLab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.581.8%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.180.7%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-22
—

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Boreal
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.7
AA Text-to-Video Arena
third-party
#25/25841VerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Wan 3.0Few votes1128
  2. #24Pika 2.5850
  3. #25BorealFew votes841
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
—
—
—
AA Image-to-Video Arena
third-party
~#26/28~1208Estimated
  1. #1Gemini Omni Flash1369
  2. #25LTX-2.5 FastFew votes1214
  3. ~#26BorealEstimated1208
  4. #26Pika 2.51202
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
—
AA Text-to-Video Arena (with audio)
third-party
#23/23838VerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Wan 3.01157
  2. #22Vidu Q3 Pro941
  3. #23BorealFew votes838
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
—
—
—
AA Image-to-Video Arena (with audio)
third-party
~last/25below measured range (<1000)Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax H31195
  2. #24Seedance 1.5 pro1000
  3. ~#25BorealEstimated<1000
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
—
LMArena Text-to-Video
third-party
~#14/18~1267Estimated
  1. #1Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashFew votes1516
  2. #13Wan 2.71337
  3. ~#14BorealEstimated1267
  4. #14Seedance 1.5 pro1256
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
—
LMArena Image-to-Video
third-party
~#17/20~1319Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax H31495
  2. #16Kling 3.0 Pro (1080p)1354
  3. ~#17BorealEstimated1319
  4. #17Seedance 1.5 pro1307
estimated from related benchmarks
—
—
—
VBench
day 0
—
—
—
—