Skip to content
Model Pareto

Muse Wonder vs GLM-5.3

Muse Wonder scores higher than GLM-5.3 in all 3 shared categories. Muse Wonder costs 3.7× as much as GLM-5.3 ($8.00 vs $2.15 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
Muse WonderGLM-5.3
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 131 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Nex-N2.5-Mini, Nex-N2.5-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Kimi K3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 5.5. 43 models are not plotted: Muse Wonder Full, GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Maple-Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Bonsai 27B, Solar Open2 250B, Muse Spark Open, Laguna S 2.1, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Flint, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL NVFP4, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, A.X-K2, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, North Mini Code, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, LFM2.5-24B-A2B, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral 2, NVIDIA Nemotron-Labs Dory1.0 4B, MiniCPM5-2B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral Small 2, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

43 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Wonder Full, GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, Atria Dawn Preview, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Beam 1.0 501B A23B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Maple-Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Bonsai 27B, Solar Open2 250B, Muse Spark Open, Laguna S 2.1, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Flint, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL NVFP4, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, A.X-K2, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, G9v3-39A5B, North Mini Code, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, LFM2.5-24B-A2B, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral 2, NVIDIA Nemotron-Labs Dory1.0 4B, MiniCPM5-2B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral Small 2, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Muse Wonder
    Quality
    84.7
    Rank
    #8/133
    Price
    $8.00/M tok
    Speed
    101tok/s
    In$4.00Out$20/M tok

    vs GLM-5.3: +10.0 quality · 3.7× price

  • GLM-5.3
    Quality
    74.8
    Rank
    #14/133
    Price
    $2.15/M tok
    Speed
    80tok/s
    In$1.40▾Out$4.40▾/M tok

    vs Muse Wonder: −10.0 quality · 0.27× price

Overview

Lab
Meta
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Released
Oct 12, 2026
Aug 14, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Open
Input price
$/M tok
$4.00
$1.40Best
Output price
$/M tok
$20
$4.40Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$8.00
$2.15Best
Output speed
tok/s
101Best
80
Context
tokens
1MBest
1M

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

84.7±4.5Best
#8/133Verified
74.8±4.5
#14/133Verified
Not ranked
82.2±4.3
#7/160Verifiedbest value
91.4±9.0
#4/97Verified
Not ranked
90.3±5.1Best
#10/213Verified
81.1±3.7
#22/213Verified
92.8±7.5Best
#3/186Verified
86.4±5.9
#5/186Verifiedbest value

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/20~92.2%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/20~89.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/88~86.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/12~85.8%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
~#2/8~91.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—
Chartography
third-party
~#4/24~49.0%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
—

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/15~84.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/15~83.5%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~58.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/22~92.0%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/22~90.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks