Skip to content
Model Pareto

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7

GPT-6 Astra scores higher in coding, writing & chat, vision and hard reasoning; Grok 4.7 in agents. GPT-6 Astra costs 6.7× as much as Grok 4.7 ($20.0 vs $3.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 103 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 27 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

27 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • GPT-6 Astra
    Quality
    86.0
    Rank
    #4/105
    Price
    $20.0/M tok
    Speed
    52tok/s
    In$10Out$50/M tok

    vs Grok 4.7: +13.5 quality · 6.7× price

  • Grok 4.7
    Quality
    72.4
    Rank
    #12/105
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    76tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$6.00▾/M tok

    vs GPT-6 Astra: −13.5 quality · 0.15× price

Overview

Lab
OpenAI
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Released
Sep 3, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$10
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$50
$6.00Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$20
$3.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
52
76Best
Context
tokens
1MBest
500K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

86.0±4.5Best
#4/105Verified
72.4±4.5
#12/105Verified
92.1±5.3Best
#5/147Verified
71.0±4.3
#26/147Verified
98.9±3.0Best
#1/83Verifiedbest value
64.1±7.3
#24/83Verified
93.5±3.7Best
#4/184Verified
81.8±5.1
#15/184Verified
81.6±4.6
#16/175Mixed
86.6±7.8Best
#5/175Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/14~89.9%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~85.7%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/20~92.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

MMMU
day 0
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/8~91.4%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/8~87.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

~#2/116~98.3%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/116~96.1%Estimated
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (1)