Skip to content
Model Pareto

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher than GPT-6.1 Sol in all 3 shared categories. Both cost about $4.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output.
Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Sol
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 117 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Nex-N2.5-Mini, Nex-N2.5-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5. 34 models are not plotted: GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

34 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

GLM-5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash NVFP4, GLM-5.3 NVFP4, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark, Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Ternary Bonsai 27B, Atria Dawn Preview, Maple-Preview, Bonsai 27B, Qwen3.8 27B NVFP4, Intern-S2-397B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Solar Open2 250B, Laguna S 2.1, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Qwen3.8 Flash-Next NVFP4, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Gemini 4 Argon
    Quality
    92.4
    Rank
    #2/119
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    —
    In$2.00▾Out$10▾/M tok

    vs GPT-6.1 Sol: +6.7 quality · 1× price

  • GPT-6.1 Sol
    Quality
    85.7
    Rank
    #5/119
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    53tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$10▾/M tok

    vs Gemini 4 Argon: −6.7 quality · 1× price

Overview

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
Lab
Google DeepMind
OpenAI
Released
Sep 30, 2026
Sep 29, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$2.00Best
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$10Best
$10Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$4.00Best
$4.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
—
53
Context
tokens
1MBest
922K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
Coding
92.4±4.5Best
#2/119Verifiedbest value
85.7±4.5
#5/119Verified
Writing & chat
94.7±5.9Best
#1/156Verifiedbest value
81.9±6.0
#8/156Verified
Vision
Not ranked
92.5±6.2
#3/91Verifiedbest value
Hard reasoning
94.5±5.1Best
#4/200Verified
91.6±5.1
#7/200Verified
Agents
Not ranked
82.5±7.8
#11/178Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/14~93.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated93.3%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~89.6%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated89.6%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
~#4/20~79.2%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
  3. ~#4Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated79.2%
  4. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#5/20~75.0%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #4Claude Opus 579.2%
  3. ~#5GPT-6.1 SolEstimated75.0%
  4. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#1/3478.8%BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#3/3473.2%Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon78.8%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol73.2%
  4. #4Grok 4.772.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#4/8857.1%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #3GPT-6 Astra59.1%
  3. #4Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
  4. #5GPT-6.1 Sol56.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
#5/8856.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #4Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
  3. #5GPT-6.1 Sol56.1%
  4. #6Claude Fable 5.152.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-29
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/25~92.1%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated92.1%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#7/25~87.3%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #6gpt-oss-120b87.8%
  3. ~#7GPT-6.1 SolEstimated87.3%
  4. #7Ternary Bonsai 27B82.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#3/10561.8%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
  3. #3Gemini 4 Argon61.8%
  4. #4Claude Sonnet 5.561.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
#20/10555.7%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #19GPT-5.555.8%
  3. #20GPT-6.1 Sol55.7%
  4. #21Claude Haiku 5.555.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-29
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
#2/1763.8BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Gemini 4 Argon63.8
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol62.9
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
#3/1762.9Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #2Gemini 4 Argon63.8
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol62.9
  4. #4Claude Fable 5.162.2
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
IFBench
day 0
~#3/134~82.8%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. ~#3Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated82.8%
  4. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#3/134~82.0%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M382.9%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B82.8%
  3. ~#3GPT-6.1 SolEstimated82.0%
  4. #3Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash81.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMLU
day 0
~#2/5~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated92.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/5~91.3%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.1 Pro92.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated91.3%
  3. #2Gemma 4 31B88.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
LMArena Text, Non-English (Elo)
third-party
#1/561512BestVerifiedFew votes
  1. #1Gemini 4 ArgonFew votes1512
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.1Few votes1496
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
#11/561469Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 ArgonFew votes1512
  2. #10Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1470
  3. #11GPT-6.1 Sol1469
  4. #12GLM-5.31463
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
LMArena Text (Elo)
third-party
#1/561525BestVerified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon1525
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.51504
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
#9/561483Verified
  1. #1Gemini 4 Argon1525
  2. #8Gemini 3.1 Pro1487
  3. #9GPT-6.1 Sol1483
  4. #10GPT-5.51482
lmarena.ai · 2026-10-02
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 (Elo)
third-party
~#7/26~2064Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #6GLM-5.32075
  3. ~#7Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated2064
  4. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
estimated from related benchmarks
~#8/26~2015Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra2173
  2. #7Claude Opus 5.52050
  3. ~#8GPT-6.1 SolEstimated2015
  4. #8Grok 4.72007
estimated from related benchmarks

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
MMMU
day 0
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
—
#3/8586.0%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra86.9%
  3. #3GPT-6.1 Sol86.0%
  4. #4Gemini 3.8 Flash85.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-29
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
—
~#2/9~85.9%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated85.9%
  3. #2Kimi K384.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
—
~#2/8~91.1%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated91.1%
  3. #2Kimi K391.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
#1/4332.0%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol32.0%
  2. #2GPT-6 Astra31.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
Chartography
third-party
—
~#4/24~47.0%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #3GPT-6 Sol53.6%
  3. ~#4GPT-6.1 SolEstimated47.0%
  4. #4Claude Haiku 5.546.4%
estimated from related benchmarks

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPQA Diamond
day 0
~#2/184~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/184~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#3/18457.1%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
  3. #3Gemini 4 Argon57.1%
  4. #4Claude Sonnet 5.555.0%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
#7/18452.9%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #6GPT-6 Astra54.7%
  3. #7GPT-6.1 Sol52.9%
  4. #8MiMo-V2.6-Pro49.4%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-29
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/32~99.1%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2Gemini 4 ArgonEstimated99.1%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/32~99.1%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 NVFP499.5%
  2. ~#2GPT-6.1 SolEstimated99.1%
  3. #2Inkling97.1%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#5/8552.6BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #4GPT-6 Astra52.7
  3. #5Gemini 4 Argon52.6
  4. #6GPT-6.1 Sol51.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-02
#6/8551.8Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #5Gemini 4 Argon52.6
  3. #6GPT-6.1 Sol51.8
  4. #7Claude Opus 550.8
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-29

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6.1 Sol
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#3/118~98.2%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. #2DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813-nvfp4-DSpark98.3%
  3. ~#3GPT-6.1 SolEstimated98.2%
  4. #3Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
~#3/12~83.7%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3GPT-6.1 SolEstimated83.7%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#3/5~56.9%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3GPT-6.1 SolEstimated56.9%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#5/18~90.7%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #4Claude Opus 590.8%
  3. ~#5GPT-6.1 SolEstimated90.7%
  4. #5Nex-N2.5-Pro89.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#14/871575Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51866
  2. #13Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1597
  3. #14GPT-6.1 Sol1575
  4. #15Step 5 Preview1566
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#5/8166.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #4Grok 4.667.0%
  3. #5GPT-6.1 Sol66.6%
  4. #6Grok 4.765.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-10-07
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
~#10/90~45.0%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #9Qwen3.8 Flash-Next45.4%
  3. ~#10GPT-6.1 SolEstimated45.0%
  4. #10Gemini 3.8 Flash44.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
Not comparable across labs (1)
OSWorld 2.0 (offline set v2026.08.08)
day 0
—
#2/471.4%Lab-reported
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra72.6%
  2. #2GPT-6.1 Sol71.4%
  3. #3GPT-6 Sol64.4%
vellum.ai · 2026-09-29