Skip to content
Model Pareto

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher than Grok 4.7 in both shared categories. Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs 1.3× as much as Grok 4.7 ($4.00 vs $3.00 per million tokens, blended 3:1 input:output).
Claude Sonnet 5.5Grok 4.7
Focus

Coding: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 103 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Granite 4.2 3B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-20b, Ling-3.0-flash-VL, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, GLM-5.3 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5. 27 models are not plotted: Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B.

27 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Xing4.0-29B-A4B, Nex-N2.5-Pro, Atria Dawn Preview, Intern-S2-397B, Solar Open2 250B, Phi-4-reasoning-plus, Motif 3, Nex-N2-Pro, Nex-N2.5-Mini, A.X-K2, K2 Horizon 375B A23B, K-EXAONE 2.0 0803, K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B, Intern-S2-Preview (35B-A3B), Command A+, North Mini Code, G9v3-39A5B, Falcon-H1-34B-Instruct, Devstral 2, K2 Horizon 7B, K2-Horizon-32B, Devstral Small 2, MiniCPM5-2B, Ling 3.0 Tiny, K2 Horizon 3.7B, K2 Horizon 0.9B, LFM2.5-2.6B

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5
    Quality
    91.4
    Rank
    #2/105
    Price
    $4.00/M tok
    Speed
    115tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$10/M tok

    vs Grok 4.7: +19.0 quality · 1.3× price

  • Grok 4.7
    Quality
    72.4
    Rank
    #12/105
    Price
    $3.00/M tok
    Speed
    76tok/s
    In$2.00▾Out$6.00▾/M tok

    vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: −19.0 quality · 0.75× price

Overview

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
Lab
Anthropic
SpaceXAI (xAI)
Released
Sep 28, 2026
Sep 21, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input price
$/M tok
$2.00Best
$2.00Best
Output price
$/M tok
$10
$6.00Best
Blended price
$/M tok · 3:1 in:out
$4.00
$3.00Best
Output speed
tok/s
115Best
76
Context
tokens
1MBest
500K

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
Coding
91.4±5.2Best
#2/105Mixedbest value
72.4±4.5
#12/105Verified
Writing & chat
Not ranked
71.0±4.3
#26/147Verified
Vision
Not ranked
64.1±7.3
#24/83Verified
Hard reasoning
95.2±4.9Best
#3/184Verifiedbest value
81.8±5.1
#15/184Verified
Agents
Not ranked
86.6±7.8
#5/175Verified

Coding benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
SWE-bench Verified
day 0
~#2/14~93.8%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated93.8%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/14~85.7%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 596.0%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated85.7%
  3. #2Claude Sonnet 585.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
SWE-bench Pro (Public)
day 0
#2/1881.3%Lab-reported
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.581.3%
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.181.2%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-28
~#6/19~68.1%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.589.9%
  2. #5Intern-S2-397B68.5%
  3. ~#6Grok 4.7Estimated68.1%
  4. #6Hy4 preview65.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
DeepSWE v1.1
day 0
#6/3171.0%Lab-reported
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol75.2%
  2. #5Muse Spark 1.371.7%
  3. #6Claude Sonnet 5.571.0%
  4. #7GPT-5.6 Terra69.6%
anthropic.com · 2026-09-28
#3/3172.6%BestVerified
  1. #1GPT-6.1 Sol75.2%
  2. #2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash74.2%
  3. #3Grok 4.772.6%
  4. #4MiMo-V2.6-Pro71.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Terminal-Bench 4.0
day 0
#1/8463.6%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #2Claude Opus 5.559.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
#16/8425.8%Verified
  1. #1Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%
  2. #15DeepSeek V4.1 Flash26.8%
  3. #16Grok 4.725.8%
  4. #17Qwen3.8 Flash-Next25.3%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
LiveCodeBench
third-party
~#2/20~92.1%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated92.1%
  3. #2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next91.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#4/20~89.4%Estimated
  1. #1Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash92.6%
  2. #3Qwen3.8 27B90.3%
  3. ~#4Grok 4.7Estimated89.4%
  4. #4Nemotron 3 Ultra89.0%
estimated from related benchmarks
SciCode
third-party
#3/9761.0%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.163.1%
  3. #3Claude Sonnet 5.561.0%
  4. #4MiMo-V2.6-Pro60.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
#11/9757.4%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.9%
  2. #10GPT-6 Sol57.6%
  3. #11Grok 4.757.4%
  4. #12Gemini 3.8 Flash56.6%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AA Coding Agent Index
third-party
~#4/15~61.0Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #3GPT-6 Astra61.6
  3. ~#4Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated61.0
  4. #4Claude Opus 559.7
estimated from related benchmarks
#6/1456.3Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.566.0
  2. #5GPT-6 Sol56.7
  3. #6Grok 4.756.3
  4. #7Muse Spark 1.354.3
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Benchmarks in other categories (4)

Writing & chat benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7

Vision benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
MMMU
day 0
—
~#2/3~71.3%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Haiku 4.573.2%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated71.3%
  3. #2Llama 4 Maverick69.4%
estimated from related benchmarks
MMMU-Pro
day 0
—
~#14/78~80.4%Estimated
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.587.7%
  2. #12Qwen3.7 Plus80.5%
  3. ~#14Grok 4.7Estimated80.4%
  4. #14GPT-5.579.9%
estimated from related benchmarks
CharXiv Reasoning
day 0
—
~#5/9~81.4%Estimated
  1. #1Gemini 3.8 Flash86.2%
  2. #4Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash83.5%
  3. ~#5Grok 4.7Estimated81.4%
  4. #5Muse Glimmer78.8%
estimated from related benchmarks
OmniDocBench v1.5
third-party
—
~#4/8~87.1%Estimated
  1. #1MiniMax-M391.6%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B91.1%
  3. ~#4Grok 4.7Estimated87.1%
  4. #4Gemini 3.1 Pro85.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDP.pdf (AA)
third-party
—
#13/4220.0%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
  2. #12GPT-6 Luna20.4%
  3. #13Grok 4.720.0%
  4. #14MiMo-V2.6-Pro19.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
Chartography
third-party
—
#18/2214.7%Verified
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra71.0%
  2. #17GLM-5.3 Flash16.3%
  3. #18Grok 4.714.7%
  4. #19DeepSeek V4.1 Flash11.6%
surgehq.ai · 2026-09-24

Hard reasoning benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
GPQA Diamond
day 0
~#2/174~96.0%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated96.0%
  3. #2Gemini 3.8 Flash95.3%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#18/174~92.3%Estimated
  1. #1GPT-6 Astra96.1%
  2. #16Qwen3.8 Flash-Next92.3%
  3. ~#18Grok 4.7Estimated92.3%
  4. #18GLM-5.391.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam
day 0
#3/18055.0%BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #2Claude Fable 5.159.1%
  3. #3Claude Sonnet 5.555.0%
  4. #4Claude Opus 554.9%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
#17/18043.1%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.561.4%
  2. #16Hy4 preview43.4%
  3. #17Grok 4.743.1%
  4. #17Qwen3.8 Max (0902)43.1%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AIME (latest)
day 0
~#2/25~96.5%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Claude Sonnet 5.5Estimated96.5%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
~#2/25~96.5%Estimated
  1. #1Inkling97.1%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated96.5%
  3. #2Muse Glimmer94.7%
estimated from related benchmarks
AA Intelligence Index
third-party
#2/7756.0BestVerified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #2Claude Sonnet 5.556.0
  3. #3Claude Fable 5.153.4
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-28
#9/7746.4Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.557.6
  2. #8GPT-6 Sol47.5
  3. #9Grok 4.746.4
  4. #10MiMo-V2.6-Pro46.3
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24

Agents benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

Metric
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Grok 4.7
τ²-bench (Telecom)
day 0
—
~#2/116~96.1%Estimated
  1. #1Step 3.7 Flash98.5%
  2. ~#2Grok 4.7Estimated96.1%
  3. #2Gemini 3.1 Pro95.6%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified
day 0
—
~#3/12~82.3%Estimated
  1. #1Kimi K384.8%
  2. #2Qwen3.8 27B84.3%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated82.3%
  4. #3Nex-N2.5-Pro82.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
day 0
—
~#3/5~58.3%Estimated
  1. #1GLM-5.3 Flash59.1%
  2. #2Kimi K358.3%
  3. ~#3Grok 4.7Estimated58.3%
  4. #3GPT-5.6 Terra50.2%
estimated from related benchmarks
BrowseComp
day 0
—
~#7/18~88.6%Estimated
  1. #1Atria Dawn Preview92.5%
  2. #6Step 5 Preview88.7%
  3. ~#7Grok 4.7Estimated88.6%
  4. #7GPT-5.6 Terra87.5%
estimated from related benchmarks
GDPval-AA (Elo)
third-party
—
#4/861695Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.51846
  2. #3Claude Opus 51708
  3. #4Grok 4.71695
  4. #5Muse Spark 1.31674
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
AutomationBench-AA
third-party
—
#5/7965.6%Verified
  1. #1Claude Opus 5.569.5%
  2. #4Grok 4.667.0%
  3. #5Grok 4.765.6%
  4. #6GLM-5.362.2%
artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-09-24
τ-Bench Banking (AA)
third-party
—
~#11/90~43.4%Estimated
  1. #1Muse Spark 1.350.5%
  2. #10Gemini 3.8 Flash44.9%
  3. ~#11Grok 4.7Estimated43.4%
  4. #11Grok 4.643.3%
estimated from related benchmarks