Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Veo 3.1 LiteKling 3.0 Standard (720p)Runway Gen-4.5
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 31 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Veo 3.1 Lite
    Quality
    40.0
    Rank
    #27/34
    Price
    $0.080/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Kling 3.0 Standard (720p): −2.4 quality · 0.32× price

  • Kling 3.0 Standard (720p)
    Quality
    42.4
    Rank
    #26/34
    Price
    $0.25/s
    Speed
    74s

    vs Veo 3.1 Lite: +2.4 quality · 3.1× price

  • Runway Gen-4.5
    Quality
    33.4
    Rank
    #28/34
    Price
    $0.12/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Kling 3.0 Standard (720p): −8.9 quality · 0.46× price

Overview

Lab
Google DeepMind
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Runway
Released
Mar 31, 2026
Feb 4, 2026
Dec 1, 2025
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.080Best
$0.25
$0.12
Render time
per clip
—
74s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

39.9±4.8
#27/34Verified
42.4±4.1Best
#26/34Verified
33.4±4.3
#28/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—
—