Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Seedream 5.0 ProMAI-Image-2.5Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Seedream 5.0 Pro
    Quality
    58.0
    Rank
    #11/38
    Price
    $0.090/img
    Speed
    68s

    vs MAI-Image-2.5: −2.8 quality · 1.9× price

  • MAI-Image-2.5
    Quality
    60.9
    Rank
    #10/38
    Price
    $0.048/img
    Speed
    28s

    vs Seedream 5.0 Pro: +2.8 quality · 0.53× price

  • Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
    Quality
    58.0
    Rank
    #12/38
    Price
    $0.13/img
    Speed
    17s

    vs MAI-Image-2.5: −2.9 quality · 2.8× price

Overview

Lab
ByteDance Seed
Microsoft AI
Google DeepMind
Released
Jul 8, 2026
Jun 2, 2026
Nov 20, 2025
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.090
$0.048Best
$0.13
Time per image
68s
28s
17sBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

58.0±3.2
#11/38Verified
60.9±3.2Best
#10/38Verified
58.0±3.2
#12/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.