Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Qwen-Image-3.0HiDream-O1-Edit-1.5Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories

Overview

Lab
Alibaba Qwen
HiDream.ai
Google DeepMind
Released
Jul 21, 2026
Aug 19, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.030Best
$0.10
$0.034
Time per image
6.2s
—
3.1sBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

48.1±4.3
#18/38Verified
49.5±8.2Best
#17/38Verified
47.9±3.2
#19/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.