Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Muse ImageMAI-Image-2.6-FlashMAI-Image-2.5-Pro
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Muse Image
    Quality
    63.8
    Rank
    #7/38
    Price
    $0.010/img
    Speed
    14s

    vs MAI-Image-2.6-Flash: −1.8 quality · 0.51× price

  • MAI-Image-2.6-Flash
    Quality
    65.7
    Rank
    #6/38
    Price
    $0.019/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Muse Image: +1.8 quality · 1.9× price

  • MAI-Image-2.5-Pro
    Quality
    61.8
    Rank
    #8/38
    Price
    $0.11/img
    Speed
    —

    vs MAI-Image-2.6-Flash: −3.8 quality · 5.6× price

Overview

Lab
Meta
Microsoft AI
Microsoft AI
Released
Jul 7, 2026
Sep 4, 2026
Jul 23, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.010Best
$0.019
$0.11
Time per image
14s
—
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

63.8±3.2
#7/38Verifiedbest value
65.6±4.3Best
#6/38Verifiedbest value
61.8±4.3
#8/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.