Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
MAI-Image-2.5-ProMuse ImageNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • MAI-Image-2.5-Pro
    Quality
    61.8
    Rank
    #8/38
    Price
    $0.11/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Muse Image: −2.0 quality · 11× price

  • Muse Image
    Quality
    63.8
    Rank
    #7/38
    Price
    $0.010/img
    Speed
    14s

    vs MAI-Image-2.5-Pro: +2.0 quality · 0.09× price

  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
    Quality
    61.8
    Rank
    #9/38
    Price
    $0.067/img
    Speed
    8.9s

    vs Muse Image: −2.1 quality · 6.7× price

Overview

Lab
Microsoft AI
Meta
Google DeepMind
Released
Jul 23, 2026
Jul 7, 2026
Feb 26, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.11
$0.010Best
$0.067
Time per image
—
14s
8.9sBest

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

61.8±4.3
#8/38Verified
63.8±3.2Best
#7/38Verifiedbest value
61.8±3.2
#9/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.