Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
MAI-Image-2.5Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Seedream 5.0 Pro
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • MAI-Image-2.5
    Quality
    60.9
    Rank
    #10/38
    Price
    $0.048/img
    Speed
    28s

    vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): −0.9 quality · 0.72× price

  • Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
    Quality
    61.8
    Rank
    #9/38
    Price
    $0.067/img
    Speed
    8.9s

    vs MAI-Image-2.5: +0.9 quality · 1.4× price

  • Seedream 5.0 Pro
    Quality
    58.0
    Rank
    #11/38
    Price
    $0.090/img
    Speed
    68s

    vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): −3.7 quality · 1.3× price

Overview

Lab
Microsoft AI
Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Released
Jun 2, 2026
Feb 26, 2026
Jul 8, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.048Best
$0.067
$0.090
Time per image
28s
8.9sBest
68s

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

60.9±3.2
#10/38Verified
61.8±3.2Best
#9/38Verified
58.0±3.2
#11/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.