Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Luma UNI 1.1Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Luma UNI 1 Max
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Luma UNI 1.1
    Quality
    42.1
    Rank
    #20/38
    Price
    $0.040/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): −5.8 quality · 1.2× price

  • Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
    Quality
    47.9
    Rank
    #19/38
    Price
    $0.034/img
    Speed
    3.1s

    vs Luma UNI 1.1: +5.8 quality · 0.83× price

  • Luma UNI 1 Max
    Quality
    41.0
    Rank
    #21/38
    Price
    $0.10/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): −6.9 quality · 3× price

Overview

Lab
Luma AI
Google DeepMind
Luma AI
Released
May 5, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
May 5, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.040
$0.034Best
$0.10
Time per image
—
3.1s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

42.1±8.2
#20/38Verified
47.9±3.2Best
#19/38Verified
41.0±3.2
#21/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.