Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Kling 3.0 Standard (720p)Veo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Lite
Focus

Video generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 31 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Hailuo 2.3, Grok Imagine Video, HiDream-O1-Video, Gemini Omni Flash. 4 models are not plotted: Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step.

4 models with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Muse Video, MAGI-2 Preview, Bach-1.0 Preview, Cosmos3-Super-Image2Video-4Step

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Kling 3.0 Standard (720p)
    Quality
    42.4
    Rank
    #26/34
    Price
    $0.25/s
    Speed
    74s

    vs Veo 3.1 Fast: −1.0 quality · 1.7× price

  • Veo 3.1 Fast
    Quality
    43.4
    Rank
    #25/34
    Price
    $0.15/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Kling 3.0 Standard (720p): +1.0 quality · 0.6× price

  • Veo 3.1 Lite
    Quality
    40.0
    Rank
    #27/34
    Price
    $0.080/s
    Speed
    —

    vs Veo 3.1 Fast: −3.4 quality · 0.53× price

Overview

Lab
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Google DeepMind
Google DeepMind
Released
Feb 4, 2026
Jan 30, 2026
Mar 31, 2026
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per second
1080p
$0.25
$0.15
$0.080Best
Render time
per clip
74s
—
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

42.4±4.1
#26/34Verified
43.4±3.0Best
#25/34Verified
39.9±4.8
#27/34Verified

Video generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.

VBench
day 0
—
—
—