Skip to content
Model Pareto

Compare models

Side by side: quality per category, price, speed, and every benchmark cell with where it came from. Pick up to four.
Imagen 4 UltraKrea 2 LargeFLUX.2 [flex]
Focus

Image generation: quality vs price

Compared models are ringed; the other 35 ranked here are greyed.

Lower price is better. Pareto frontier: Z-Image Turbo, Muse Image, MAI-Image-2.6-Flash, MAI-Image-2.6, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. 1 models are not plotted: Qwen-Image-2.1.

1 model with no price data — shown in the strip at the left edge

Qwen-Image-2.1

  • Best-value frontier (nothing is both cheaper and better)
  • Evidencestrong → weak
  • Estimated from other categories
  • Imagen 4 Ultra
    Quality
    29.6
    Rank
    #27/38
    Price
    $0.060/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Krea 2 Large: −0.4 quality · 1× price

  • Krea 2 Large
    Quality
    30.0
    Rank
    #26/38
    Price
    $0.060/img
    Speed
    34s

    vs Imagen 4 Ultra: +0.4 quality · 1× price

  • FLUX.2 [flex]
    Quality
    29.6
    Rank
    #28/38
    Price
    $0.060/img
    Speed
    —

    vs Krea 2 Large: −0.4 quality · 1× price

Overview

Lab
Google DeepMind
Krea
Black Forest Labs
Released
Jun 26, 2025
May 26, 2026
Nov 25, 2025
Weights
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Price per image
$0.060Best
$0.060Best
$0.060Best
Time per image
—
34s
—

Quality by category

0–100 within each category (100 = best tracked model). Rank is among all models ranked there. Click a row to focus it.

29.6±4.7
#27/38Verified
30.0±4.3Best
#26/38Verified
29.6±3.2
#28/38Verified

Image generation benchmarks

Rank among models with a published score, and the leaderboard around each model. ~ italic = no published score, estimated from related benchmarks.